Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27412124›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2017

National disparities in minimally invasive surgery for pancreatic tumors.

Emmanuel Gabriel, Pragatheeshwar Thirunavukarasu, Kristopher Attwood, Steven J Nurkin

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Sociodemographic variation in the utilization of minimally invasive surgical approaches for pancreatic cancer.HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Strengths and Limitations of Registries in Surgical Oncology Research.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emmanuel GabrielDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Carlton House A-206, Elm & Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY, 14263, USA.
Pragatheeshwar ThirunavukarasuDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Carlton House A-206, Elm & Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY, 14263, USA.
Kristopher AttwoodDepartment of Biostatistics, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Steven J NurkinDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Carlton House A-206, Elm & Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY, 14263, USA. steven.nurkin@roswellpark.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor patients with pancreatic tumors, several disparities have been shown to impact access to care, including surgery, and subsequently adversely affect long-term oncologic outcomes. The aim of this study was to investigate national disparities in minimally invasive surgery (MIS) across different demographics for pancreatic tumors.

methodsWe utilized the American College of Surgeons (ACS) National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) to identify patients with pancreatic tumors from 2010 to 2011 who had undergone surgery through either an open or MIS approach. Multivariable analysis was performed to investigate differences in patient characteristics in relation to surgical approach and conversion to open.

resultsA total of 2809 patients were identified. The initial surgical approach included 86.5 % open (2430) and 13.5 % MIS (87.6 % were laparoscopic, and 12.4 % were robotic). Tumor histology was significantly associated with MIS, whereby patients with neuroendocrine tumors were more than twice as likely to have an MIS approach compared to adenocarcinoma. Tumor location within the pancreas was also associated with MIS, with tumors in the tail being three times more likely to be removed through MIS compared to tumors in the head. For patients with disease in the body or tail of the pancreas, ethnicity was independently associated with MIS whereby patients of Hispanic origin were less likely to have MIS. The conversion rate to open was 27.7 %, and geographic location was associated with conversion rates.

conclusionsMIS procedures comprise approximately 13.5 % of surgical procedures for pancreatic tumors. In addition to tumor histology, differences in surgical approach were identified with respect to ethnicity for patients with tumors in the body/tail of the pancreas.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityAdenocarcinomaAgedConversion to Open SurgeryFemaleHumansLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedNeuroendocrine TumorsPancreatic NeoplasmsRacial GroupsRetrospective StudiesRobotic Surgical ProceduresUnited StatesDisparitiesLaparoscopic and robotic surgeryPancreatic tumors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.