Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27411728›Full record

ArticleFamily practice2016

What does it take to set goals for self-management in primary care? A qualitative study.

Stephanie Anna Lenzen, Jerôme Jean Jacques van Dongen, Ramon Daniëls, Marloes Amantia van Bokhoven, Trudy van der Weijden, Anna Beurskens

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Family practice, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Development and usability of a feedback tool, "My Personal Brain Health Dashboard", to improve setting of self-management goals among people living with HIV in Canada.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stephanie Anna LenzenResearch Centre for Autonomy and Participation for People with a Chronic Illness, Zuyd University of Applied Sciences, Heerlen, The Netherlands and stephanie.lenzen@zuyd.nl.
Jerôme Jean Jacques van DongenResearch Centre for Autonomy and Participation for People with a Chronic Illness, Zuyd University of Applied Sciences, Heerlen, The Netherlands and.
Ramon DaniëlsResearch Centre for Autonomy and Participation for People with a Chronic Illness, Zuyd University of Applied Sciences, Heerlen, The Netherlands and.
Marloes Amantia van BokhovenDepartment of Family Medicine, CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Trudy van der WeijdenDepartment of Family Medicine, CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Anna BeurskensResearch Centre for Autonomy and Participation for People with a Chronic Illness, Zuyd University of Applied Sciences, Heerlen, The Netherlands and.
Maastricht University · NLZuyd University of Applied Sciences · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is an increasing number of patients with a chronic illness demanding primary care services. This demands for effective self-management support, including collaborative goal setting. Despite the fact that primary care professionals seem to have difficulties implementing goal setting, little information is available about the factors influencing the complexity of this process in primary care.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to contribute to an understanding of the complexity of self-management goal setting in primary care by exploring experts' and primary care professionals' experiences with self-management goal setting and viewpoints regarding influencing factors.

methodsA descriptive qualitative research methodology was adopted. Two focus groups and three individual interviews were conducted (total participants n = 17). Thematic content analysis was used to analyse the data.

resultsThe findings were categorized into four main themes with subordinated subthemes. The themes focus around the complexity of setting non-medical goals and around professionals' skills and attitudes to negotiate and decide about goals with patients. Furthermore, patients' skills and attitudes for goal setting and the integration of goal setting in the time available were formulated as themes.

conclusionsSetting self-management goals in primary care, especially in family medicine, might require a shift from a medical perspective to a biopsychosocial perspective, with an increasing role set aside for the professional to coach the patient in expressing his self-management goals and to take responsibility for these goals.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelPatient Care PlanningPrimary Health CareSelf CareAdultAgedChronic DiseaseClinical CompetenceFemaleFocus GroupsHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedNegotiatingPatient ParticipationChronic diseasegoalspatient-centred careprimary health carequalitative researchself-care.

Identifiers

PMID27411728
PMCPMC5161487
OpenAlexW2463775604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.