Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27411667›Full record

ArticleBMC immunology2016

Avidity characterization of genetically engineered T-cells with novel and established approaches.

Victoria Hillerdal, Vanessa F Boura, Hanna Björkelund, Karl Andersson, Magnus Essand

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC immunology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Strategies and rules for tuning TCR-derived therapy.Expert reviews in molecular medicine · 2023
    Review
  2. A Bright Horizon: Immunotherapy for Pediatric T-Cell Malignancies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  3. TARP as antigen in cancer immunotherapy.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2021
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Victoria HillerdalDepartment of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Vanessa F BouraDepartment of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Hanna BjörkelundDepartment of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Karl AnderssonDepartment of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Magnus EssandDepartment of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. magnus.essand@igp.uu.se.
Uppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdoptive transfer of genetically engineered autologous T-cells is becoming a successful therapy for cancer. The avidity of the engineered T-cells is of crucial importance for therapy success. We have in the past cloned a T-cell receptor (TCR) that recognizes an HLA-A2 (MHC class I)-restricted peptide from the prostate and breast cancer- associated antigen TARP. Herein we perform a side-by-side comparison of the TARP-specific TCR (TARP-TCR) with a newly cloned TCR specific for an HLA-A2-restricted peptide from the cytomegalovirus (CMV) pp65 antigen.

resultsBoth CD8(+) T-cells and CD4(+) T-cells transduced with the HLA-A2-restricted TARP-TCR could readily be detected by multimer analysis, indicating that the binding is rather strong, since binding occured also without the CD8 co-receptor of HLA-A2. Not surprisingly, the TARP-TCR, which is directed against a self-antigen, had weaker binding to the HLA-A2/peptide complex than the CMV pp65-specific TCR (pp65-TCR), which is directed against a viral epitope. Higher peptide concentrations were needed to achieve efficient cytokine release and killing of target cells when the TARP-TCR was used. We further introduce the LigandTracer technology to study cell-cell interactions in real time by evaluating the interaction between TCR-engineered T-cells and peptide-pulsed cancer cells. We were able to successfully detect TCR-engineered T-cell binding kinetics to the target cells. We also used the xCELLigence technology to analyzed cell growth of target cells to assess the killing potency of the TCR-engineered T-cells. T-cells transduced with the pp65 - TCR exhibited more pronounced cytotoxicity, being able to kill their targets at both lower effector to target ratios and lower peptide concentrations.

conclusionThe combination of binding assay with functional assays yields data suggesting that TARP-TCR-engineered T-cells bind to their target, but need more antigen stimulation compared to the pp65-TCR to achieve full effector response. Nonetheless, we believe that the TARP-TCR is an attractive candidate for immunotherapy development for prostate and/or breast cancer.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCancer VaccinesCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesCell Growth ProcessesCytokinesCytotoxicity, ImmunologicFemaleGenetic EngineeringHEK293 CellsHLA-A2 AntigenHumansImmunotherapy, AdoptiveLymphocyte ActivationMaleNuclear ProteinsCancer VaccinesCytokinescytomegalovirus matrix protein 65kDaHLA-A2 AntigenNuclear ProteinsPeptidesPhosphoproteinsReceptors, Antigen, T-CellTARPViral Matrix ProteinsAffinityAvidityCMV pp65HLA bindingLigandTracerTARPT-cell receptorxCELLigence

Identifiers

PMID27411667
PMCPMC4944473
OpenAlexW2468049982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.