ArticleCancer cell2016
Modeling the Epigenetic Chain Reaction Downstream of DNMT3A(R882H).
Article in Cancer cell, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chemogenomics for drug discovery: clinical molecules from open access chemical probes.RSC chemical biology · 2021Review
- Cooperation of Dnmt3a R878H with Nras G12D promotes leukemogenesis in knock-in mice: a pilot study.BMC cancer · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this issue of Cancer Cell, Lu et al. use a mouse model of DNMT3A(R882H)/NRAS(G12D) acute myeloid leukemia to define a cascade of chromatin changes that emanate from DNMT3A-bound enhancers to initiate disease. The authors also reveal a chemical strategy to interrupt this process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27411582What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.