Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27411041›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of comparative neurology2019

Amacrine cells coupled to ganglion cells via gap junctions are highly vulnerable in glaucomatous mouse retinas.

Abram Akopian, Sandeep Kumar, Hariharasubramanian Ramakrishnan, Suresh Viswanathan, Stewart A Bloomfield

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of comparative neurology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. The Variety of Mechanosensitive Ion Channels in Retinal Neurons.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. The RBPMSiScience · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Abram AkopianDepartment of Biological and Vision Sciences, State University of New York College of Optometry, New York, New York, 10036.
Sandeep KumarDepartment of Biological and Vision Sciences, State University of New York College of Optometry, New York, New York, 10036.
Hariharasubramanian RamakrishnanDepartment of Biological and Vision Sciences, State University of New York College of Optometry, New York, New York, 10036.
Suresh ViswanathanDepartment of Biological and Vision Sciences, State University of New York College of Optometry, New York, New York, 10036.
Stewart A BloomfieldDepartment of Biological and Vision Sciences, State University of New York College of Optometry, New York, New York, 10036.
SUNY College of Optometry · US

Funding

Functional Roles of Retinal Gap Junctions in Visual ProcessingR01EY007360 · NEI · STATE COLLEGE OF OPTOMETRY · PI BLOOMFIELD, STEWART ALLEN · 1988 to 2021
$9.8M
The Role of Gap Junctions in the Progressive Loss of Retinal Neurons in GlaucomaR01EY026024 · NEI · STATE COLLEGE OF OPTOMETRY · PI BLOOMFIELD, STEWART ALLEN · 2016 to 2018
$1.2M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY007360NEI NIH HHS R01 EY026024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We determined whether the structural and functional integrity of amacrine cells (ACs), the largest cohort of neurons in the mammalian retina, are affected in glaucoma. Intraocular injection of microbeads was made in mouse eyes to elevate intraocular pressure as a model of experimental glaucoma. Specific immunocytochemical markers were used to identify AC and displaced (d)ACs subpopulations in both the inner nuclear and ganglion cell layers, respectively, and to distinguish them from retinal ganglion cells (RGCs). Calretinin- and γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-immunoreactive (IR) cells were highly vulnerable to glaucomatous damage, whereas choline acetyltransferase (ChAT)-positive and glycinergic AC subtypes were unaffected. The AC loss began 4 weeks after initial microbead injection, corresponding to the time course of RGC loss. Recordings of electroretinogram (ERG) oscillatory potentials and scotopic threshold responses, which reflect AC and RGC activity, were significantly attenuated in glaucomatous eyes following a time course that matched that of the AC and RGC loss. Moreover, we found that it was the ACs coupled to RGCs via gap junctions that were lost in glaucoma, whereas uncoupled ACs were largely unaffected. Our results suggest that AC loss in glaucoma occurs secondary to RGC death through the gap junction-mediated bystander effect. J. Comp. Neurol. 527:159-173, 2019. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Indexed as

Gap JunctionsAmacrine CellsAnimalsBystander EffectFemaleGlaucomaMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLRetinal Ganglion CellsAB_10061777AB_11003211AB_2167511AB_90893amacrine cellscell deathelectroretinogramganglion cellsglaucomaneuroprotectionretinaRRIDs: AB_2109797

Identifiers

PMID27411041
PMCPMC7047713
OpenAlexW2505997080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.