Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27410750›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2016

Pericellular Brush and Mechanics of Guinea Pig Fibroblast Cells Studied with AFM.

Maxim Dokukin, Yulija Ablaeva, Vivekanand Kalaparthi, Andrei Seluanov, Vera Gorbunova, Igor Sokolov

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Measuring the Elastic Properties of Living Cells.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2027
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maxim DokukinDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts.
Yulija AblaevaDepartment of Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York.
Vivekanand KalaparthiDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts.
Andrei SeluanovDepartment of Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York.
Vera GorbunovaDepartment of Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York. Electronic address: vera.gorbunova@rochester.edu.
Igor SokolovDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts; Department of Physics, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts. Electronic address: igor.sokolov@tufts.edu.
Tufts University · USUniversity of Rochester · US

Funding

The role of hyaluronan in longevity and cancer resistance of longest-lived rodentP01AG047200 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI Andrei Seluanov · 2014 to 2026
$36.9M
Regulation of genome stability by SITR6R01AG046320 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI SELUANOV, ANDREI · 2014 to 2018
$1.9M
Comparative analysis of IGF-1 and mTOR signaling in short- and long-lived rodentsR03AG052365 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI GORBUNOVA, VERA · 2016 to 2017
$154k
NIA NIH HHS P01 AG047200NIA NIH HHS R01 AG046320NIA NIH HHS R03 AG052365
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The atomic force microscopy (AFM) indentation method combined with the brush model can be used to separate the mechanical response of the cell body from deformation of the pericellular layer surrounding biological cells. Although self-consistency of the brush model to derive the elastic modulus of the cell body has been demonstrated, the model ability to characterize the pericellular layer has not been explicitly verified. Here we demonstrate it by using enzymatic removal of hyaluronic content of the pericellular brush for guinea pig fibroblast cells. The effect of this removal is clearly seen in the AFM force-separation curves associated with the pericellular brush layer. We further extend the brush model for brushes larger than the height of the AFM probe, which seems to be the case for fibroblast cells. In addition, we demonstrate that an extension of the brush model (i.e., double-brush model) is capable of detecting the hierarchical structure of the pericellular brush, which, for example, may consist of the pericellular coat and the membrane corrugation (microridges and microvilli). It allows us to quantitatively segregate the large soft polysaccharide pericellular coat from a relatively rigid and dense membrane corrugation layer. This was verified by comparison of the parameters of the membrane corrugation layer derived from the force curves collected on untreated cells (when this corrugation membrane part is hidden inside the pericellular brush layer) and on treated cells after the enzymatic removal of the pericellular coat part (when the corrugations are exposed to the AFM probe). We conclude that the brush model is capable of not only measuring the mechanics of the cell body but also the parameters of the pericellular brush layer, including quantitative characterization of the pericellular layer structure.

Indexed as

Mechanical PhenomenaMicroscopy, Atomic ForceAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaElastic ModulusEntropyFibroblastsGuinea Pigs

Identifiers

PMID27410750
PMCPMC4944720
OpenAlexW2471624693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.