Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27410743›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2016

On the Equivalence of FCS and FRAP: Simultaneous Lipid Membrane Measurements.

Radek Macháň, Yong Hwee Foo, Thorsten Wohland

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Radek MacháňDepartment of Biological Sciences and Centre for BioImaging Sciences, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Yong Hwee FooMechanobiology Institute, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Thorsten WohlandDepartment of Biological Sciences and Centre for BioImaging Sciences, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Department of Chemistry, National University of Singapore, Singapore. Electronic address: twohland@nus.edu.sg.
National University of Singapore · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS) and fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) are widely used methods to determine diffusion coefficients. However, they often do not yield the same results. With the advent of camera-based imaging FCS, which measures the diffusion coefficient in each pixel of an image, and proper bleaching corrections, it is now possible to measure the diffusion coefficient by FRAP and FCS in the exact same images. We thus performed simultaneous FCS and FRAP measurements on supported lipid bilayers and live cell membranes to test how far the two methods differ in their results and whether the methodological differences, in particular the high bleach intensity in FRAP, the bleach corrections, and the fitting procedures in the two methods explain observed differences. Overall, we find that the FRAP bleach intensity does not measurably influence the diffusion in the samples, but that bleach correction and fitting introduce large uncertainties in FRAP. We confirm our results by simulations.

Indexed as

Fluorescence Recovery After PhotobleachingCell MembraneDiffusionLipid BilayersSpectrometry, FluorescenceTime FactorsLipid Bilayers

Identifiers

PMID27410743
PMCPMC4945495
OpenAlexW2473423548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.