Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27410410›Full record

ArticleRevista Brasileira de terapia intensiva2016

Drug incompatibilities in the adult intensive care unit of a university hospital.

Naiane Roveda Marsilio, Daiandy da Silva, Denise Bueno

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista Brasileira de terapia intensiva, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Implementation of pharmacists' monitoring for intravenous drug compatibility.European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Evaluation of Incompatible Coadministration of Continuous Intravenous Infusions in a Pediatric/Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Naiane Roveda MarsilioPrograma de Residência Integrada Multiprofissional em Saúde, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Daiandy da SilvaUnidade de Assistência Farmacêutica, Serviço de Farmácia, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Denise BuenoPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Assistência Farmacêutica, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study sought to identify the physical and chemical incompatibilities among the drugs administered intravenously to patients admitted to an adult intensive care unit. We also aimed to establish pharmaceutical guidelines for administering incompatible drugs.

methodsThis cross-sectional, prospective, and quantitative study was conducted from July to September 2015. Drug incompatibilities were identified based on an analysis of the patient prescriptions available in the hospital online management system. A pharmaceutical intervention was performed using the guidelines on the preparation and administration of incompatible drugs. Adherence to those guidelines was subsequently assessed among the nursing staff.

resultsA total of 100 prescriptions were analyzed; 68 were incompatible with the intravenous drugs prescribed. A total of 271 drug incompatibilities were found, averaging 4.0 ± 3.3 incompatibilities per prescription. The most commonly found drug incompatibilities were between midazolam and hydrocortisone (8.9%), between cefepime and midazolam (5.2%), and between hydrocortisone and vancomycin (5.2%). The drugs most commonly involved in incompatibilities were midazolam, hydrocortisone, and vancomycin. The most common incompatibilities occurred when a drug was administered via continuous infusion and another was administered intermittently (50%). Of the 68 prescriptions that led to pharmaceutical guidelines, 45 (66.2%) were fully adhered to by the nursing staff.

conclusionPatients under intensive care were subjected to a high rate of incompatibilities. Drug incompatibilities can be identified and eliminated by the pharmacist on the multidisciplinary team, thereby reducing undesirable effects among patients.

Indexed as

Drug IncompatibilityIntensive Care UnitsPractice Guidelines as TopicAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsFemaleGuideline AdherenceHospitals, UniversityHumansInfusions, IntravenousMaleMiddle AgedNursing Staff, HospitalPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID27410410
PMCPMC4943052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.