Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27410261›Full record

ReviewPloS one2016

Indicator Properties of Baltic Zooplankton for Classification of Environmental Status within Marine Strategy Framework Directive.

Elena Gorokhova, Maiju Lehtiniemi, Lutz Postel, Gunta Rubene, Callis Amid, Jurate Lesutiene, Laura Uusitalo, Solvita Strake, Natalja Demereckiene

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Elena GorokhovaDepartment of Environmental Science and Analytical Chemistry, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4192-6956
Maiju LehtiniemiFinnish Environment Institute, Marine Research Center, Helsinki, Finland.
Lutz PostelLeibniz Institute for Baltic Sea Research, Rostock-Warnemünde, Rostock, Germany.
Gunta RubeneDepartment of Fish Resources Research, Institute of Food Safety, Animal Health and Environment, Riga, Latvia.
Callis AmidDepartment of Environmental Science and Analytical Chemistry, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Jurate LesutieneOpen Access Centre for Marine Research, Klaipėda University, Klaipeda, Lithuania.
Laura UusitaloFinnish Environment Institute, Marine Research Center, Helsinki, Finland.
Solvita StrakeLatvian Institute of Aquatic Ecology, Riga, Latvia.
Natalja DemereckieneLithuanian Environmental Protection Agency, Klaipėda, Lithuania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The European Marine Strategy Framework Directive requires the EU Member States to estimate the level of anthropogenic impacts on their marine systems using 11 Descriptors. Assessing food web response to altered habitats is addressed by Descriptor 4 and its indicators, which are being developed for regional seas. However, the development of simple foodweb indicators able to assess the health of ecologically diverse, spatially variable and complex interactions is challenging. Zooplankton is a key element in marine foodwebs and thus comprise an important part of overall ecosystem health. Here, we review work on zooplankton indicator development using long-term data sets across the Baltic Sea and report the main findings. A suite of zooplankton community metrics were evaluated as putative ecological indicators that track community state in relation to Good Environmental Status (GES) criteria with regard to eutrophication and fish feeding conditions in the Baltic Sea. On the basis of an operational definition of GES, we propose mean body mass of zooplankton in the community in combination with zooplankton stock measured as either abundance or biomass to be applicable as an integrated indicator that could be used within the Descriptor 4 in the Baltic Sea. These metrics performed best in predicting zooplankton being in-GES when considering all datasets evaluated. However, some other metrics, such as copepod biomass, the contribution of copepods to the total zooplankton biomass or biomass-based Cladocera: Copepoda ratio, were equally reliable or even superior in certain basin-specific assessments. Our evaluation suggests that in several basins of the Baltic Sea, zooplankton communities currently appear to be out-of-GES, being comprised by smaller zooplankters and having lower total abundance or biomass compared to the communities during the reference conditions; however, the changes in the taxonomic structure underlying these trends vary widely across the sea basins due to the estuarine character of the Baltic Sea.

Indexed as

EcosystemFood ChainAnimalsBaltic StatesBiodiversityBiomassCopepodaEnvironmental MonitoringEutrophicationOceans and SeasZooplankton

Identifiers

PMID27410261
PMCPMC4943737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.