Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27409814›Full record

ArticleNature2016

Ablation-cooled material removal with ultrafast bursts of pulses.

Can Kerse, Hamit Kalaycıoğlu, Parviz Elahi, Barbaros Çetin, Denizhan K Kesim, Önder Akçaalan, Seydi Yavaş, Mehmet D Aşık, Bülent Öktem, Heinar Hoogland and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 107 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
107citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

107 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Ultrafast Laser Synthesis of Zeolites.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

47 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Can KerseDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Bilkent University, Ankara 06800, Turkey.
Hamit KalaycıoğluDepartment of Physics, Bilkent University, Ankara 06800, Turkey.
Parviz ElahiDepartment of Physics, Bilkent University, Ankara 06800, Turkey.
Barbaros ÇetinDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Bilkent University, Ankara 06800, Turkey.
Denizhan K KesimDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Bilkent University, Ankara 06800, Turkey.
Önder AkçaalanDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Bilkent University, Ankara 06800, Turkey.
Seydi YavaşFiberLAST, Inc., Ankara 06531, Turkey.
Mehmet D AşıkNanotechnology and Nanomedicine Department, Hacettepe University, Ankara 06800, Turkey.
Bülent ÖktemASELSAN, Ankara 06150, Turkey.
Heinar HooglandMenlo Systems GmbH, Am Kloperspitz 19a, Martinsried 82152, Germany.
Ronald HolzwarthMenlo Systems GmbH, Am Kloperspitz 19a, Martinsried 82152, Germany.
Fatih Ömer IldayDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Bilkent University, Ankara 06800, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of femtosecond laser pulses allows precise and thermal-damage-free removal of material (ablation) with wide-ranging scientific, medical and industrial applications. However, its potential is limited by the low speeds at which material can be removed and the complexity of the associated laser technology. The complexity of the laser design arises from the need to overcome the high pulse energy threshold for efficient ablation. However, the use of more powerful lasers to increase the ablation rate results in unwanted effects such as shielding, saturation and collateral damage from heat accumulation at higher laser powers. Here we circumvent this limitation by exploiting ablation cooling, in analogy to a technique routinely used in aerospace engineering. We apply ultrafast successions (bursts) of laser pulses to ablate the target material before the residual heat deposited by previous pulses diffuses away from the processing region. Proof-of-principle experiments on various substrates demonstrate that extremely high repetition rates, which make ablation cooling possible, reduce the laser pulse energies needed for ablation and increase the efficiency of the removal process by an order of magnitude over previously used laser parameters. We also demonstrate the removal of brain tissue at two cubic millimetres per minute and dentine at three cubic millimetres per minute without any thermal damage to the bulk.

Indexed as

Cold TemperatureHot TemperatureAnimalsBrainCattleCorneaDentinHumansLasersLaser TherapyRatsTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID27409814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.