Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27409461›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2016

Evaluating the Effects of Riboflavin/UV-A and Rose-Bengal/Green Light Cross-Linking of the Rabbit Cornea by Noncontact Optical Coherence Elastography.

Manmohan Singh, Jiasong Li, Zhaolong Han, Srilatha Vantipalli, Chih-Hao Liu, Chen Wu, Raksha Raghunathan, Salavat R Aglyamov, Michael D Twa, Kirill V Larin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Rose Bengal-Assisted Photodynamic Antimicrobial Therapy for Keratitis.Journal of ocular pharmacology and therapeutics : the official journal of the Association for Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Biomedical optics express · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Wave-based optical coherence elastography: The 10-year perspective.Progress in biomedical engineering (Bristol, England) · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Ultrahigh-sensitive optical coherence elastography.Light, science & applications · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Manmohan SinghDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, United States.
Jiasong LiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, United States.
Zhaolong HanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, United States.
Srilatha VantipalliCollege of Optometry, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, United States.
Chih-Hao LiuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, United States.
Chen WuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, United States.
Raksha RaghunathanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, United States.
Salavat R AglyamovDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, United States.
Michael D TwaSchool of Optometry, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States.
Kirill V LarinDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, United States 5Interdisciplinary Laboratory of Biophotonics, Tomsk State University, Tomsk, Russia.
University of Houston · USThe University of Texas at Austin · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

Consortium for Broad Based Disease Phenotyping of Knockout MiceU54HG006348 · NHGRI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI BEAUDET, ARTHUR L., PAYLOR, RICHARD E · 2011 to 2015
$17.0M
Research Programming ModuleP30EY007551 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON · PI VALLABH E DAS · 1988 to 2026
$16.4M
Optical Coherence Elastography of the CorneaR01EY022362 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON · PI Salavat R Aglyamov, Kirill V Larin · 2012 to 2026
$6.7M
Biomechanics of early mammalian cardiogenesisR01HL120140 · NHLBI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI LARINA, IRINA · 2013 to 2017
$2.0M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY007551NEI NIH HHS R01 EY022362NHGRI NIH HHS U54 HG006348NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL120140
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was to use noncontact optical coherence elastography (OCE) to evaluate and compare changes in biomechanical properties that occurred in rabbit cornea in situ after corneal collagen cross-linking by either of two techniques: ultraviolet-A (UV-A)/riboflavin or rose-Bengal/green light.

methodsLow-amplitude (≤10 μm) elastic waves were induced in mature rabbit corneas by a focused air pulse. Elastic wave propagation was imaged by a phase-stabilized swept source OCE (PhS-SSOCE) system. Corneas were then cross-linked by either of two methods: UV-A/riboflavin (UV-CXL) or rose-Bengal/green light (RGX). Phase velocities of the elastic waves were fitted to a previously developed modified Rayleigh-Lamb frequency equation to obtain the viscoelasticity of the corneas before and after the cross-linking treatments. Micro-scale depth-resolved phase velocity distribution revealed the depth-wise heterogeneity of both cross-linking techniques.

resultsUnder standard treatment settings, UV-CXL significantly increased the stiffness of the corneas by ∼47% (P < 0.05), but RGX did not produce statistically significant increases. The shear viscosities were unaffected by either cross-linking technique. The depth-wise phase velocities showed that UV-CXL affected the anterior ∼34% of the corneas, whereas RGX affected only the anterior ∼16% of the corneas.

conclusionsUV-CXL significantly strengthens the cornea, whereas RGX does not, and the effects of cross-linking by UV-CXL reach deeper into the cornea than cross-linking effects of RGX under similar conditions.

Indexed as

Ultraviolet RaysAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaCollagenCorneaCorneal DiseasesCross-Linking ReagentsDisease Models, AnimalElasticityElasticity Imaging TechniquesFluorescent DyesPhotosensitizing AgentsRabbitsRiboflavinRose BengalCollagenCross-Linking ReagentsFluorescent DyesPhotosensitizing AgentsRiboflavinRose Bengal

Identifiers

PMID27409461
PMCPMC4968774
OpenAlexW2463850935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.