Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27407186›Full record

ReviewJournal of food science and technology2016

Biogenic amines in seafood: a review.

K B Biji, C N Ravishankar, R Venkateswarlu, C O Mohan, T K Srinivasa Gopal

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of food science and technology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Overview of Patagonian Red Octopus (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Genomic Sequence ofVeterinary sciences · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

K B BijiICAR-Central Institute of Fisheries Technology, Willingdon Island, Cochin, Kerala India.
C N RavishankarICAR-Central Institute of Fisheries Technology, Willingdon Island, Cochin, Kerala India.
R VenkateswarluICAR-Central Institute of Fisheries Technology, Willingdon Island, Cochin, Kerala India.
C O MohanICAR-Central Institute of Fisheries Technology, Willingdon Island, Cochin, Kerala India.
T K Srinivasa GopalICAR-Central Institute of Fisheries Technology, Willingdon Island, Cochin, Kerala India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The biogenic amines are low molecular weight organic bases present normally in the body with biological activity influencing important physiological functions. The physiological functions of these molecules are achieved by very low concentrations in the tissues. However, significantly high amounts of biogenic amines are produced during processing and storage of seafood as a result of microbial contamination and inadequate storage conditions. Microorganisms having decarboxylase enzyme activity convert amino acids to their respective biogenic amines. Biogenic amines in seafood have been implicated as a major causative agent of food borne illness, where intoxication results from the ingestion of foods containing higher amount of biogenic amines. Hence its identification, quantitation and awareness of this food borne toxin are important in relation to food safety and spoilage. The aim of this paper is to review the basic concepts of seafood quality and safety in relation to biogenic amines along with its control measures and future areas for research.

Indexed as

Biogenic aminesFishHistamineScombrotoxin

Identifiers

PMID27407186
PMCPMC4921096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.