Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27407036›Full record

ReviewEBioMedicine2016

Oncolytic Viruses: Therapeutics With an Identity Crisis.

Caroline J Breitbach, Brian D Lichty, John C Bell

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EBioMedicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
13.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 106 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Estrogen-mediated NF-κB blockade enables breast cancer sensitivity to oncolytic VSV virotherapy.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Arboviruses in Cancer therapy: pros and cons.Journal of neurovirology · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Caroline J BreitbachTurnstone Biologics, 787 Bank Street, Ottawa, Ontario K1S 3V5, Canada.
Brian D LichtyTurnstone Biologics, 787 Bank Street, Ottawa, Ontario K1S 3V5, Canada; McMaster Immunology Research Centre, Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University,1280 Main St. Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada; MG DeGroote Institute for Infectious Disease Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
John C BellTurnstone Biologics, 787 Bank Street, Ottawa, Ontario K1S 3V5, Canada; Centre for Innovative Cancer Therapeutics, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 501 Smyth Rd, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada. Electronic address: jbell@ohri.ca.
McMaster University · CAOttawa Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oncolytic viruses (OV) are replicating viral therapeutics for the treatment of cancer and have been in laboratory development for about twenty years. Recently, the FDA approved Imlygic, a herpes virus based therapeutic for the treatment of melanoma and thus OVs have entered a new era where they are a weapon in the armament of the oncologist. OVs are unique therapeutics with multiple mechanisms of therapeutic activity. The exact path for their development and eventual uptake by pharmaceutical companies is somewhat clouded by an uncertain identity. Are they vaccines, tumour lysing therapeutics, inducers of innate immunity, gene therapy vectors, anti-vascular agents or all of the above? Should they be developed as stand-alone loco-regional therapeutics, systemically delivered tumour hunters or immune modulators best tested as combination therapeutics? We summarize data here supporting the idea, depending upon the virus, that OVs can be any or all of these things. Pursuing a "one-size fits all" approach is counter-productive to their clinical development and instead as a field we should build on the strengths of individual virus platforms.

Indexed as

Oncolytic VirotherapyAnimalsCancer VaccinesClinical Trials as TopicGenetic TherapyGenetic VectorsHumansImmunomodulationImmunotherapyNeoplasmsOncolytic VirusesTreatment OutcomeTumor MicroenvironmentCancer VaccinesImmune checkpoint inhibitorsIn situ vaccineOncolytic immunotherapyOncolytic virus

Identifiers

PMID27407036
PMCPMC4972563
OpenAlexW2466689966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.