Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27406818›Full record

ArticleNeurocritical care2016

EEG Characteristics of Successful Burst Suppression for Refractory Status Epilepticus.

Emily L Johnson, Nirma Carballido Martinez, Eva K Ritzl

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurocritical care, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Status epilepticus in the ICU.Intensive care medicine · 2024
    Review
  5. Quantitative assessment of burst suppression as a predictor of seizure recurrence in refractory status epilepticus.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Seizure Management in the Intensive Care Unit.Current treatment options in neurology · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Updates in Refractory Status Epilepticus.Critical care research and practice · 2018
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Emily L JohnsonDepartment of Neurology, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. ejohns92@jhmi.edu.
Nirma Carballido MartinezDepartment of Neurology, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Eva K RitzlDepartment of Neurology, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · USJohns Hopkins Medicine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRefractory status epilepticus (RSE) is often treated with continuous intravenous medications with the goal of EEG burst suppression. Standard advice is to titrate medications to at least 10-s interburst intervals; however, this has not been shown to improve outcome. We examined EEG characteristics in patients treated with IV anesthetic therapy (IVAT) for RSE to determine which EEG characteristics were associated with successful lifting of IVAT (i.e., without recurrence of status epilepticus).

methodsWe screened the clinical continuous EEG database for adult patients treated with IVAT for RSE (excluding patients with anoxic injury). We measured the length of bursts and interburst intervals for each patient, calculated EEG burst suppression ratios, and graded bursts for the amount of epileptiform activity. We compared these characteristics in successful versus unsuccessful IVAT lifting attempts.

resultsWe included 17 successful and 20 unsuccessful lifting attempts in 19 patients (5 used as a holdout validation set). The interburst intervals, burst suppression ratios, and length of bursts did not differentiate successful and unsuccessful lifting attempts; the amount of epileptiform activity in bursts correlated with success or failure to wean IVAT (p = 0.008). Maximum burst amplitude <125 μV had 84.6 % sensitivity and 61.1 % specificity for predicting successful lifting.

conclusionThe length of interburst intervals and burst suppression did not predict successful termination of RSE in this small cohort. This may suggest that EEG characteristics, rather a strict interburst interval goal, could guide IVAT for RSE.

Indexed as

Outcome Assessment, Health CareAdultAgedAnestheticsDrug Resistant EpilepsyElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedStatus EpilepticusAnestheticsBurst suppressionContinuous EEG monitoringEEGRefractory status epilepticusSeizuresStatus epilepticus

Identifiers

PMID27406818
OpenAlexW2460091041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.