Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27406647›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2016

Mortality Reduction in Septic Shock by Plasma Adsorption (ROMPA): a protocol for a randomised clinical trial.

Francisco Colomina-Climent, Carola Giménez-Esparza, Cristina Portillo-Requena, José Manuel Allegue-Gallego, María Galindo-Martínez, Cristina Mollà-Jiménez, José Luis Antón-Pascual, Manuel Rodríguez-Serra, José Luis Martín-Ruíz, Pablo Juan Fernández-Arroyo and 13 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02357433 naterminatednot on this map

Reduccion de la Mortalidad Mediante Plasma-Adsorción en Shock séptico (ROMPA)

TypeinterventionalSponsorFrancisco Colomina ClimentRan2015 to 2018Enrolled55ConditionsSeptic ShockArmsHigh Doses CPFA
NCT03589378 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy of PEAF for Septic Shock With Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome in ICU:A Multicenter,Open-Parallelled ,Randomized and Controlled Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorShenzhen Second People's HospitalRan2018 to 2020Enrolled168ConditionsSeptic Shock, Multiple Organ Dysfunction SyndromeArmsPEAF
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. The preventative effects ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Francisco Colomina-ClimentDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Miguel Hernández University, San Juan de Alicante, Spain.
Carola Giménez-EsparzaIntensive Care Unit, Vega Baja Hospital of Orihuela, Orihuela, Spain.
Cristina Portillo-RequenaIntensive Care Unit, Vega Baja Hospital of Orihuela, Orihuela, Spain.
José Manuel Allegue-GallegoIntensive Care Unit, General University Santa Lucía Hospital of Cartagena, Cartagena, Spain.
María Galindo-MartínezIntensive Care Unit, General University Santa Lucía Hospital of Cartagena, Cartagena, Spain.
Cristina Mollà-JiménezIntensive Care Unit, University Hospital of San Juan de Alicante, San Juan de Alicante, Spain.
José Luis Antón-PascualIntensive Care Unit, University Hospital of San Juan de Alicante, San Juan de Alicante, Spain.
Manuel Rodríguez-SerraIntensive Care Unit, Lluís Alcanyís Hospital of Xàtiva, Xàtiva, Spain.
José Luis Martín-RuízIntensive Care Unit, Lluís Alcanyís Hospital of Xàtiva, Xàtiva, Spain.
Pablo Juan Fernández-ArroyoIntensive Care Unit, Marina Baixa Hospital of Villajoyosa, Villajoyosa, Spain.
Eugenia María Blasco-CíscarIntensive Care Unit, Marina Baixa Hospital of Villajoyosa, Villajoyosa, Spain.
José Cánovas-RoblesIntensive Care Unit, General University Hospital of Alicante, Alicante, Spain.
Miguel Herrera-MurilloIntensive Care Unit, General University Hospital of Alicante, Alicante, Spain.
Enrique González-HernándezIntensive Care Unit, La Plana Hospital of Villarreal, Villarreal, Spain.
Fernando Sánchez-MoránIntensive Care Unit, La Plana Hospital of Villarreal, Villarreal, Spain.
Manuel Solera-SuárezIntensive Care Unit, Francesc de Borja Hospital of Gandía, Gandía, Spain.
Jesús Torres-TortajadaIntensive Care Unit, Francesc de Borja Hospital of Gandía, Gandía, Spain.
José María Nuñez-MartínezIntensive Care Unit, Vinalopó University Hospital of Elche, Elche, Spain.
David Martín-LangerwerfIntensive Care Unit, Vinalopó University Hospital of Elche, Elche, Spain.
Eugenio Herrero-GutiérrezIntensive Care Unit, University Hospital of Torrevieja, Torrevieja, Spain.
Isabel Sebastián-MuñozIntensive Care Unit, University Hospital of Torrevieja, Torrevieja, Spain.
Antonio Palazón-BruDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Miguel Hernández University, San Juan de Alicante, Spain.
Vicente Francisco Gil-GuillénDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Miguel Hernández University, San Juan de Alicante, Spain.
Universitat de Miguel Hernández d'Elx · ESHospital General Universitario de Alicante Doctor Balmis · ESHospital Lluis Alcanyis · ESHospital Marina Baixa · ESHospital Quirón Torrevieja · ESHospital Universitario del Vinalopó · ESHospital Universitari Sant Joan D'Alacant · ESHospital Vega Baja · ESSanta Lucía University General Hospital · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThere is a lack of evidence in the efficacy of the coupled plasma filtration adsorption (CPFA) to reduce the mortality rate in septic shock. To fill this gap, we have designed the ROMPA study (Mortality Reduction in Septic Shock by Plasma Adsorption) to confirm whether treatment with an adequate dose of treated plasma by CPFA could confer a clinical benefit. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Our study is a multicentric randomised clinical trial with a 28-day and 90-day follow-up and allocation ratio 1:1. Its aim is to clarify whether the application of high doses of CPFA (treated plasma ≥0.20 L/kg/day) in the first 3 days after randomisation, in addition to the current clinical practice, is able to reduce hospital mortality in patients with septic shock in intensive care units (ICUs) at 28 and 90 days after initiation of the therapy. The study will be performed in 10 ICUs in the Southeast of Spain which follow the same protocol in this disease (based on the Surviving Sepsis Campaign). Our trial is designed to be able to demonstrate an absolute mortality reduction of 20% (α=0.05; 1-β=0.8; n=190(95×2)). The severity of the process, ensuring the recruitment of patients with a high probability of death (50% in the control group), will be achieved through an adequate stratification by using both severity scores and classical definitions of severe sepsis/septic shock and dynamic parameters. Our centres are fully aware of the many pitfalls associated with previous medical device trials. Trying to reduce these problems, we have developed a training programme to improve the CPFA use (especially clotting problems). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol was approved by the Ethics Committees of all the participant centres. The findings of the trial will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals, as well as national and international conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02357433; Pre-results.

Indexed as

HemofiltrationAdolescentAdsorptionAdultCytokinesFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleResearch DesignSepsisSeverity of Illness IndexShock, SepticSpainCytokinesINFECTIOUS DISEASESSTATISTICS & RESEARCH METHODS

Identifiers

PMID27406647
PMCPMC4947802
OpenAlexW2460766313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.