SynthesisBMJ open2016
Intra-articular bupivacaine after joint arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised placebo-controlled studies.
Synthesis in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of the pulsed electromagnetic field in osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis.BMJ open · 2018Pooled it
- Trial
- Comparison of the pericapsular nerve group block with the intra-articular and quadratus lumborum blocks in primary total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.Korean journal of anesthesiology · 2023Trial
- Adverse events associated with local anaesthetic use in musculoskeletal injection therapy: a scoping review.BMJ open sport & exercise medicine · 2026Article
- Analgesic efficacy of single-shot adductor canal block versus adductor canal block combined with intra-articular ropivacaine infusion after total knee arthroplasty.Bone & joint open · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of intra-articular (IA) bupivacaine administered for pain relief after joint arthroplasty.
designMeta-analysis.
methodsA systematic review was conducted to identify the randomised controlled trials using IA bupivacaine for postoperative pain relief from MEDLINE, Cochrane Library and EMBASE databases (up to October 2015). The standardised mean difference (SMD), the relative risk (RR) and their corresponding 95% CIs were calculated using the RevMan statistical software.
resultsA total of 11 randomised controlled trials were included. Statistically significant differences between IA bupivacaine and placebo were observed for the mean visual analogue scale (VAS) values (SMD -0.55; 95% CI -0.89 to -0.22; p<0.001) and narcotic consumption (SMD -0.32; 95% CI -0.55 to -0.08; p=0.008) during the period of 24 hours postoperatively and narcotic consumption during the period between 24 and 48 hours postoperatively (SMD -0.32; 95% CI -0.55 to -0.08; p=0.009). However, there was no significant difference in the mean VAS pain score during the period between 24 and 48 hours postoperatively (SMD -0.09, 95% CI -0.30 to 0.11; p=0.37) and in the incidence of adverse effects 24-72 hours postoperatively (RR 0.97; 95% CI 0.60 to 1.57; p=0.91).
conclusionsThe administration of IA bupivacaine after joint arthroplasty is effective for pain relief without increasing adverse effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.