Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27406629›Full record

ArticleLa Radiologia medica2016

Mammography and MRI for screening women who underwent chest radiation therapy (lymphoma survivors): recommendations for surveillance from the Italian College of Breast Radiologists by SIRM.

Giovanna Mariscotti, Paolo Belli, Daniela Bernardi, Beniamino Brancato, Massimo Calabrese, Luca A Carbonaro, Beatrice Cavallo-Marincola, Francesca Caumo, Paola Clauser, Laura Martinchich and 7 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in La Radiologia medica, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. The emerging role of contrast-enhanced mammography.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Giovanna MariscottiRadiologia 1U, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, A. O. U. Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Università di Torino, Via Genova, 3, 10126, Turin, Italy.
Paolo BelliDipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Agostino Gemelli, 8, 0168, Rome, Italy.
Daniela BernardiU.O. Senologia Clinica e Screening Mammografico, Dipartimento di Radiologia, APSS, Centro per i Servizi Sanitari, Pal. C, viale Verona, 38123, Trento, Italy.
Beniamino BrancatoIstituto per lo Studio e la Prevenzione Oncologica (ISPO), Via Cosimo il Vecchio, 2, 50139, Florence, Italy.
Massimo CalabreseUOC Senologia Diagnostica, IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, Largo Rosanna Benzi, 10, 16132, Genoa, Italy.
Luca A CarbonaroUnit of Radiology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Via Morandi, 30, 20097, San Donato Milanese, Milan, Italy.
Beatrice Cavallo-MarincolaDipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche, Oncologiche ed Anatomo-patologiche, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza Università di Roma, Viale Regina Elena, 324, 00161, Rome, Italy.
Francesca CaumoUOSD Breast Unit ULSS20, Piazza Lambranzi, 1, 37142, Verona, Italy.
Paola ClauserDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Division of Molecular and Gender Imaging, Medical University of Vienna/Vienna General Hospital, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Laura MartinchichUnit of Radiology, Institute for Cancer Research and Treatment (IRCC)-FPO, 10060, Candiolo, Turin, Italy.
Stefania MontemezziDAI Patologia e Diagnostica, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, P.le A. Stefani, 1, 37126, Verona, Italy.
Pietro PanizzaU.O. Radiologia Senologica, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy.
Federica PediconiDipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche, Oncologiche ed Anatomo-patologiche, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza Università di Roma, Viale Regina Elena, 324, 00161, Rome, Italy.
Alberto TagliaficoDepartment of Experimental Medicine, DIMES, Institute of Anatomy, University of Genova, Via de Toni, 14, 16132, Genoa, Italy.
Rubina M TrimboliUnit of Radiology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Via Morandi, 30, 20097, San Donato Milanese, Milan, Italy.
Chiara ZuianiInstitute of Radiology, University of Udine, P.le S. M. della Misericordia, 15, 33100, Udine, Italy.
Francesco SardanelliUnit of Radiology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Via Morandi, 30, 20097, San Donato Milanese, Milan, Italy. francesco.sardanelli@unimi.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Women who underwent chest radiation therapy (CRT) during pediatric/young-adult age (typically, lymphoma survivors) have an increased breast cancer risk, in particular for high doses. The cumulative incidence from 40 to 45 years of age is 13-20 %, similar to that of BRCA mutation carriers for whom contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is recommended. However, in women who underwent CRT, MRI sensitivity is lower (63-80 %) and that of mammography higher (67-70 %) than those observed in women with hereditary predisposition, due to a higher incidence of ductal carcinoma in situ with microcalcifications and low neoangiogenesis. A sensitivity close to 95 % can be obtained only using mammography as an adjunct to MRI. Considering the available evidence, women who underwent CRT before 30 receiving a cumulative dose ≥10 Gy should be invited after 25 (or, at least, 8 years after CRT) to attend the following program: 1. interview about individual risk profile and potential of breast imaging; 2. annual MRI using the same protocol recommended for women with hereditary predisposition; 3. annual bilateral two-view full-field digital mammography or digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) with synthetic 2D reconstructions. Mammography and MRI can be performed at once or alternately every 6 months. In the case of MRI or contrast material contraindications, ultrasound will be performed instead of MRI. Reporting using BI-RADS is recommended. At the age for entering population screening, the individual risk profile will be discussed with the woman about opting for only mammography/DBT screening or for continuing the intensive protocol.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingMammographyPopulation SurveillanceAdultBreast NeoplasmsConsensusContrast MediaFemaleHumansItalyLymphomaMiddle AgedNeoplasms, Radiation-InducedRisk FactorsContrast MediaBreast cancerLymphoma survivorsMRIScreening

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.