Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27406036›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2016

Health professionals and the early detection of head and neck cancers: a population-based study in a high incidence area.

Karine Ligier, Olivier Dejardin, Ludivine Launay, Emmanuel Benoit, Emmanuel Babin, Simona Bara, Bénédicte Lapôtre-Ledoux, Guy Launoy, Anne-Valérie Guizard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. India Needs Its Own "Make Sense" - Educating the Public on Head and Neck Cancers.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Karine LigierGeneral Cancer Registry of Lille and its area, GCS-C2RC, F-59037, Lille, France. kligier@registrecancers59.fr.
Olivier DejardinUniversity Hospital of Caen, U1086 INSERM UCBN "Cancers & preventions", F-14000, Caen, France.
Ludivine LaunayUniversity Hospital of Caen, U1086 INSERM UCBN "Cancers & preventions", F-14000, Caen, France.
Emmanuel BenoitERSM-Nord, F-59665, Villeneuve d'Ascq, France.
Emmanuel BabinUniversity Hospital of Caen, U1086 INSERM UCBN "Cancers & preventions", F-14000, Caen, France.
Simona BaraGeneral Cancer Registry of Manche, Centre Hospitalier Public du Cotentin, F-50100, Cherbourg-Octeville, France.
Bénédicte Lapôtre-LedouxGeneral Cancer Registry of Somme, Hôpital Nord, F-80054, Amiens, France.
Guy LaunoyUniversity Hospital of Caen, U1086 INSERM UCBN "Cancers & preventions", F-14000, Caen, France.
Anne-Valérie GuizardGeneral Cancer Registry of Calvados, U1086 INSERM UCBN "Cancers et preventions", Centre F Baclesse, F-14000, Caen, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the context of early detection of head and neck cancers (HNC), the aim of this study was to describe how people sought medical consultation during the year prior to diagnosis and the impact on the stage of the cancer.

methodsPatients over 20 years old with a diagnosis of HNC in 2010 were included from four French cancer registries. The medical data were matched with data regarding uptake of healthcare issued from French National Health Insurance General Regime.

resultsIn 86.0 % of cases, patients had consulted a general practitioner (GP) and 21.1 % a dentist. Consulting a GP at least once during the year preceding diagnosis was unrelated to Charlson index, age, sex, département, quintile of deprivation of place of residence. Patients from the 'quite privileged', 'quite underprivileged' and 'underprivileged' quintiles consulted a dentist more frequently than those from the 'very underprivileged' quintile (p = 0.007). The stage was less advanced for patients who had consulted a GP (OR = 0.42 [0.18-0.99]) - with a dose-response effect.

conclusionsIn view of the frequency of consultations, the existence of a significant association between consultations and a localised stage at diagnosis and the absence of a socio-economic association, early detection of HNC by GPs would seem to be the most appropriate way.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerAgedAlcohol DrinkingFemaleHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansMaleMedical StaffMiddle AgedReferral and ConsultationRisk FactorsTobacco UseCancers registryEarly detectionEpidemiologyHead and neck cancersHealth insuranceSocio-economic factorsStage at diagnosisUptake of healthcare

Identifiers

PMID27406036
PMCPMC4942882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.