Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27405983›Full record

SynthesisClinical drug investigation2016

The Results of ACES (Antihypertensive Combinations' Long Term Efficacy Comparing Study): Analysis of Metabolic Effects of Antihypertensive Combination Therapies.

Zoltán Nádházi, Csaba András Dézsi

Abstract readComparative StudyMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical drug investigation, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zoltán Nádházi2nd Department of Internist Medicine Center, Semmelweis University of Budapest, Budapest, Hungary.
Csaba András DézsiDepartment of Cardiology, Petz Aladár County Teaching Hospital, Vasvári Pál str. 2-4., Győr, 9024, Hungary. dcsa62@gmail.com.
Petz Aladár Megyei Oktató Kórház · HUSemmelweis University · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMore than 50 % of hypertensive patients have lipid disorders, and one-third of hypertensive patients have impaired glucose metabolism. Owing to the high prevalence of metabolic risk factors and/or comorbidities, antihypertensives with favorable or neutral metabolic effects are preferred. Based on the available evidence, diuretics and β-blockers are heterogeneous regarding their metabolic effects.

objectiveThe aim of ACES (Antihypertensive Combinations' Long Term Efficacy Comparing Study) was to compare the efficacy and metabolic effects of a carvedilol/indapamide free combination, a fixed-dose combination of perindopril/amlodipine, and a fixed combination of perindopril/indapamide in everyday practice.

methodsThis study was a 6-month, multi-center, prospective, observational, non-interventional, open-label clinical study. The data of 9124 outpatients (4898 female, 4226 male; mean age 61.7 ± 11.7 years) with mild, moderate, or severe essential (primary) hypertension with one or more metabolic risk factors were subjected to statistical analysis. At visits one (day 1), three (month 3), and four (month 6), the following metabolic parameters were monitored: fasting blood glucose, glycosylated hemoglobin, estimated glomerular filtration rate, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol, triglycerides, and serum potassium, sodium, creatinine, and uric acid levels. A total of 3888 patients took perindopril/amlodipine, while 2992 took perindopril/indapamide, and 2244 took a combination of carvedilol/indapamide. Statistical analysis was carried out using the one-paired t test and the Chi square test; the two-sided level of significance was set at 0.05.

resultsThe observed changes in the main metabolic parameters were favorable and similar in all therapeutic groups: fasting blood glucose decreased by 5.5-5.5-5.5 %, total cholesterol by 9.0-10.2-9.9 %, and triglycerides by 12.7-15.4-13.8 % (respectively in perindopril/amlodipine, perindopril/indapamide and carvedilol/indapamide groups).

conclusionsBased on our findings, we conclude that the metabolic profile of indapamide is very similar to the metabolically neutral and well-documented metabolic profiles of the calcium-channel blocker amlodipine and the vasodilator β-blocker carvedilol and that all the combinations studied had similar beneficial effects on the main metabolic parameters. The favorable changes of metabolic parameters are because of the discontinuation of active substances (e.g., conventional thiazides, second-generation β-blockers) used in the previous therapy, which were associated with unfavorable metabolic effects, and to the increase in the ratio of administered lipid-lowering drugs and oral antidiabetic drugs.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAmlodipineAntihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureCalcium Channel BlockersCarbazolesCarvedilolDiureticsDrug CombinationsEssential HypertensionFemaleHumansHypertensionIndapamideAmlodipineamlodipine, perindopril drug combinationAntihypertensive AgentsCalcium Channel BlockersCarbazolesCarvedilolDiureticsDrug CombinationsIndapamideindapamide, perindopril drug combinationLipoproteins, LDLPerindoprilPropanolamines

Identifiers

PMID27405983
OpenAlexW2466746394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.