Trial reportGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2017
Variability of panretinal photocoagulation lesions across physicians and patients. Quantification of diameter and intensity variation.
Trial report in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Less Expansion of Short-Pulse Laser Scars in Panretinal Photocoagulation for Diabetic Retinopathy.Journal of ophthalmology · 2018Article
- Teleguided photocoagulation treatments across continents with a remotely programmed laser for retinal diseases.Therapeutic advances in ophthalmologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPhotocoagulation lesion intensity relies on the judgement of retinal blanching. Lesions turn out variable due to observer-dependent judgement and time dependency of blanching. We investigated lesion variability per patient and per physician in clinical routine treatments.
methodsIn this observational clinical trial, different physicians performed panretinal photocoagulation for diabetic retinopathy. Study eyes received 20-30 study lesions at 20 ms (three physicians, nine eyes) and 200 ms (four physicians, 12 eyes) irradiation time (532 nm continuous wave photocoagulator, 300 μm spot size). Lesions were imaged after 1 hour with photography and optical coherence tomography (OCT). We measured lesion diameters in fundus and OCT images, and graded intensities according to a previously published six-step classifier.
results200-ms lesions were larger and more severe (568, 474-625 μm [median, IQR], predominantly class 6) than 20-ms lesions (397, 347-459 μm, predominantly classes 3-4). The impact of laser power was small compared to other factors. Lesion intensities and diameters in fundus and OCT images varied significantly between patients and between physicians. Median photographic lesion diameters varied by up to a factor of 1.61 (20 ms) or 1.5 (200 ms) respectively.
conclusionsIn this study, the treated area of retina varied by up to a factor of 1.61
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.