Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27405619›Full record

Trial reportClinical and experimental nephrology2017

Design and baseline characteristics of the LANDMARK study.

Hiroaki Ogata, Masafumi Fukagawa, Hideki Hirakata, Hideaki Kaneda, Tatsuo Kagimura, Tadao Akizawa, LANDMARK Study Group

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical and experimental nephrology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. State-of-the-Art Management of Hyperphosphatemia in Patients With CKD: An NKF-KDOQI Controversies Perspective.American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation · 2021
    Article
  9. Foreign-body reaction to lanthanum on gastric mucosa.Clinical and experimental nephrology · 2019
    Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Hiroaki OgataDepartment of Internal Medicine, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, 35-1 Chigasaki-chuo, Tsuzuki-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 224-8503, Japan. ogatah@med.showa-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0046-5575
Masafumi FukagawaDivision of Nephrology, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Kanagawa, Japan.
Hideki HirakataDivision of Nephrology and Dialysis Center, Japanese Red Cross Fukuoka Hospital, Fukuoka, Fukuoka, Japan.
Hideaki KanedaTranslational Research Informatics Center, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.
Tatsuo KagimuraTranslational Research Informatics Center, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.
Tadao AkizawaDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Showa University School of Medicine, Sinagawa-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
LANDMARK Study Group
Translational Research Informatics Center (Japan) · JPJapanese Red Cross Fukuoka Hospital · JPShowa University · JPShowa University Northern Yokohama Hospital · JPTokai University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCalcium (Ca)-based phosphate (P) binders, compared to non-Ca-based P binders, contribute to vascular calcification, which is associated with cardiovascular events.

methodsThe LANDMARK study is a multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel comparative study of lanthanum carbonate (LC) and calcium carbonate (CC) in hemodialysis patients. Stable hemodialysis patients with intact parathyroid hormone ≤240 pg/mL meeting ≥1 of the following criteria (age >65 years, postmenopause, diabetes mellitus) were randomized into the LC and CC groups. LC group patients initially received LC 750 mg/day or the previously used dose and were titrated up to a maximum 2250 mg/day to achieve serum P levels of 3.5-6.0 mg/dL. CC group patients received CC 3 g/day or the previously used dose and were titrated to achieve the same P range. If the target serum P level was not achieved, non-Ca-based P binders (other than LC) could also be added. The primary endpoint is survival time free of cardiovascular events, including cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction or stroke, and unstable angina.

resultsOverall, 2309 patients were allocated to the LC (N = 1154) or CC group (N = 1155). At baseline, the mean age was 68.4 years, 40.4 % were women, 55.9 % had diabetes, 18.3 % had a history of ischemic heart disease, and 13.9 % had cerebrovascular disease. A total of 184 patients (8.4 %) had undergone coronary intervention procedures. Baseline characteristics were well balanced between groups.

conclusionsThe LANDMARK study will determine whether LC, a non-Ca-based P binder, reduces cardiovascular mortality and morbidity in chronic hemodialysis patients.

Indexed as

Renal DialysisAgedBiomarkersCalcium CarbonateCardiovascular DiseasesChelating AgentsClinical ProtocolsDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansHyperphosphatemiaJapanLanthanumMaleMiddle AgedPhosphatesBiomarkersCalcium CarbonateChelating AgentsLanthanumlanthanum carbonatePhosphatesCalciumCardiovascular eventHemodialysisPhosphate binderRandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID27405619
PMCPMC5556131
OpenAlexW2466325962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.