Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27405615›Full record

ArticleSocial cognitive and affective neuroscience2016

Neural response to pictorial health warning labels can predict smoking behavioral change.

Philip J Riddle, Roger D Newman-Norlund, Jessica Baer, James F Thrasher

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Brain system integration and message consistent health behavior change.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2022
    Article
  5. Social networks and neural receptivity to persuasive health messages.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Advancing Tobacco Product Warning Labels Research Methods and Theory: A Summary of a Grantee Meeting Held by the US National Cancer Institute.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2019
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Associations between coherent neural activity in the brain's value system during antismoking messages and reductions in smoking.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Philip J RiddleDepartment of Health Promotion Education and Behavior, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Roger D Newman-NorlundDepartment of Exercise Science, University of South Carolina, USC Brain Stimulation Lab, Columbia, SC, USA rnorlund@mailbox.sc.edu.
Jessica BaerDepartment of Exercise Science, University of South Carolina, USC Brain Stimulation Lab, Columbia, SC, USA.
James F ThrasherDepartment of Health Promotion Education and Behavior, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
University of South Carolina · US

Funding

Variation in Cigarettes, Tobacco use Behaviors and Exposures in ITC CountriesP01CA138389 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI CUMMINGS, KENNETH MICHAEL · 2009 to 2013
$13.4M
Building evidence for effective and sustainable cigarette warning label policyR01CA167067 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI THRASHER, JAMES · 2012 to 2016
$2.7M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA138389NCI NIH HHS R01 CA167067
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In order to improve our understanding of how pictorial health warning labels (HWLs) influence smoking behavior, we examined whether brain activity helps to explain smoking behavior above and beyond self-reported effectiveness of HWLs. We measured the neural response in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) and the amygdala while adult smokers viewed HWLs. Two weeks later, participants' self-reported smoking behavior and biomarkers of smoking behavior were reassessed. We compared multiple models predicting change in self-reported smoking behavior (cigarettes per day [CPD]) and change in a biomarkers of smoke exposure (expired carbon monoxide [CO]). Brain activity in the vmPFC and amygdala not only predicted changes in CO, but also accounted for outcome variance above and beyond self-report data. Neural data were most useful in predicting behavioral change as quantified by the objective biomarker (CO). This pattern of activity was significantly modulated by individuals' intention to quit. The finding that both cognitive (vmPFC) and affective (amygdala) brain areas contributed to these models supports the idea that smokers respond to HWLs in a cognitive-affective manner. Based on our findings, researchers may wish to consider using neural data from both cognitive and affective networks when attempting to predict behavioral change in certain populations (e.g. cigarette smokers).

Indexed as

Product LabelingTobacco ProductsAdultAmygdalaBiomarkersBreath TestsCarbon MonoxideFemaleHumansIntentionMaleNerve NetPattern Recognition, VisualPrefrontal CortexSelf ReportSmokingBiomarkersCarbon MonoxideamygdalafMRIpictorial health warning labels (HWLs)smokingventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC)

Identifiers

PMID27405615
PMCPMC5091679
OpenAlexW2460768252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.