Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27405601›Full record

ArticleWiener klinische Wochenschrift2016

Current practice in neurocritical care of patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage and severe traumatic brain injury : Results of the Austrian Neurosurvey Study.

Günther Herzer, Udo Illievich, Wolfgang G Voelckel, Helmut Trimmel

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Günther HerzerDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Karl Landsteiner Institute of Emergency Medicine, General Hospital Wiener Neustadt, Corvinusring 3-5, 2700, Wiener Neustadt, Austria.
Udo IllievichDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Landes-Nervenklinik Wagner-Jauregg, Linz, Austria.
Wolfgang G VoelckelDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, AUVA Trauma Centre Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Helmut TrimmelDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Karl Landsteiner Institute of Emergency Medicine, General Hospital Wiener Neustadt, Corvinusring 3-5, 2700, Wiener Neustadt, Austria. helmut.trimmel@wienerneustadt.lknoe.at.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe task force Neuroanaesthesia of the Austrian Society of Anaesthesiology, Resuscitation and Intensive Care Medicine (ÖGARI) is aiming to develop and provide recommendations in order to improve neurocritical care in Austria. Thus, a survey on neurocritical care concepts in Austria regarding intensive care of subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) and severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) was performed to assess the current status.

methodsAn online internet questionnaire comprising 59 items on current concepts of SAH and TBI critical care was sent to 117 anaesthesiology departments.

resultsThe survey was answered by 30 (25.6 %) of the hospitals, 24 (80 %) of them treating patients with SAH and/or TBI. Data from ten SAH centres reveal that definitive care was achieved within 24 h in all hospitals; a case load >50 per year is noted in 70 % of intensive care units (ICU). In all, 50 % of departments employ written protocols for treatment. Regarding the treatment of TBI patients, 14 answers were received, indicating that 42.9 % of departments provide care for >50 patients per year. Time between arrival and CT scan is <30 min in all hospitals, and 28.6 % of departments rely on written protocols. Only 14.3 % of hospitals report about routine morbidity and mortality rounds. While the neurologic status is assessed at discharge from the ICU, there is no evaluation of 1‑year outcome.

conclusionsDefinitive care of SAH and TBI patients is achieved timely in Austria. When compared with SAH, more hospitals with lower case loads take care of TBI patients. Written guidelines and protocols at institutional level are often missing. Since routine morbidity and mortality conferences are sparse, and long-term outcome is not assessed, there is room for improvement.

Indexed as

Brain Injuries, TraumaticComorbidityCritical CareFemaleHealth Care SurveysHumansMalePractice Patterns, Physicians'PrevalenceSubarachnoid HemorrhageTime-to-TreatmentTreatment OutcomeUtilization ReviewWorkloadAneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhageCurrent practiceNeurocritical careSurvey studyTraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.