ReviewScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2016
High flow nasal cannula in children: a literature review.
Review in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
56 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 178 citations in OpenAlex.
- Paediatric Long-Term Home Respiratory Support: Recommendations of the Swiss Society of Paediatric Pulmonology.Respiration; international review of thoracic diseases · 2026Guideline
- Comparison of high-flow nasal cannula oxygenation and non-invasive ventilation for postoperative pediatric cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Outcomes of High-Flow Nasal Cannula Vs. Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Young Children With Respiratory Distress: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2021Pooled it
- High flow nasal cannula as respiratory support in treating infant bronchiolitis: a systematic review.European journal of pediatrics · 2020Pooled it
- Effect of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy vs conventional oxygen therapy on adult postcardiothoracic operation: A meta-analysis.Medicine · 2018Pooled it
- "Comparison between high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy and noninvasive ventilation (NIV) in children with acute respiratory failure by bronchiolitis: a randomized controlled trial".BMC pediatrics · 2024Trial
- Comparison of the effects of high-flow nasal cannula and bilevel positive airway pressure treatments as respiratory physiotherapy interventions for children with asthma exacerbation: a randomized clinical trial.Einstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2024Trial
- Comparison of heated humidified high-flow nasal cannula flow rates (1-L·kg·minPediatric pulmonology · 2019Trial
- High-Flow Nasal Cannula and Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Infants With Acute Bronchiolitis-Trends of Use in Norway.Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992) · 2026Observational
- Clinical Predictors of High-Flow Nasal Cannula Failure in Children with Acute Respiratory Illness: A Single-Center Experience.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2026Observational
- High-flow nasal cannula therapy in pediatric care: A regional practice survey from KSA.Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences · 2026Article
- Review
- Review
- High-flow nasal cannula for respiratory support in children with severe asthma attack: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Acute and critical care · 2025Article
- Article
- High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy: physiological basis and clinical applications in anesthesia.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Utilization of High-Flow Nasal Cannulas in Pediatric Critical Care: A Single-Center Experience.Cureus · 2024Article
- Aerosol Delivery Efficiency With High-Flow Nasal Cannula Therapy in Neonatal, Pediatric, and Adult Nasal Upper-Airway and Lung Models.Respiratory care · 2024Article
- Evaluating Pressure Variability and Influencing Factors during High-Flow Nasal Cannula Therapy in Premature Infants.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
High flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is a relatively new non-invasive ventilation therapy that seems to be well tolerated in children. Recently a marked increase in the use of HFNC has been seen both in paediatric and adult care settings. The aim of this study was to review the current knowledge of HFNC regarding mechanisms of action, safety, clinical effects and tolerance in children beyond the newborn period.We performed a systematic search of the databases PubMed, Medline, EMBASE and Cochrane up to 12th of May 2016. Twenty-six clinical studies including children on HFNC beyond the newborn period with various respiratory diseases hospitalised in an emergency department, paediatric intensive care unit or general ward were included. Five of these studies were interventional studies and 21 were observational studies. Thirteen studies included only children with bronchiolitis, while the other studies included children with various respiratory conditions. Studies including infants hospitalised in a neonatal ward, or adults over 18 years of age, as well as expert reviews, were not systematically evaluated, but discussed if appropriate.The available studies suggest that HFNC is a relatively safe, well-tolerated and feasible method for delivering oxygen to children with few adverse events having been reported. Different mechanisms including washout of nasopharyngeal dead space, increased pulmonary compliance and some degree of distending airway pressure may be responsible for the effect. A positive clinical effect on various respiratory parameters has been observed and studies suggest that HFNC may reduce the work of breathing. Studies including children beyond the newborn period have found that HFNC may reduce the need of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and invasive ventilation, but these studies are observational and have a low level of evidence. There are no international guidelines regarding flow rates and the optimal maximal flow for HFNC is not known, but few studies have used a flow rate higher than 10 L/min for infants.Until more evidence from randomized studies is available, HFNC may be used as a supplementary form of respiratory support in children, but with a critical approach regarding effect and safety, particularly when operated outside of a paediatric intensive care unit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.