Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27404992›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2017

Multiple breath washout of hyperpolarized

Felix C Horn, Madhwesha Rao, Neil J Stewart, Jim M Wild

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Functional Pulmonary Imaging.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2025
    Review
  4. DynamicJHLT open · 2025
    Article
  5. UltrasensitiveAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. In vivo methods and applications of xenon-129 magnetic resonance.Progress in nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy · 2021
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Multibreath HyperpolarizedAcademic radiology · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Hyperpolarized gas MRI in pulmonology.The British journal of radiology · 2018
    Review
  15. Optically polarizedReviews of modern physics
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Felix C HornPOLARIS, Unit of Academic Radiology, Department of Infection, Immunity & Cardiovascular Disease, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Madhwesha RaoPOLARIS, Unit of Academic Radiology, Department of Infection, Immunity & Cardiovascular Disease, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Neil J StewartPOLARIS, Unit of Academic Radiology, Department of Infection, Immunity & Cardiovascular Disease, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Jim M WildPOLARIS, Unit of Academic Radiology, Department of Infection, Immunity & Cardiovascular Disease, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.

Funding

Department of Health NIHR-RP-R3-12-027
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare quantitative fractional ventilation measurements from multiple breath washout imaging (MBW-I) using hyperpolarized

methodsSeven healthy subjects were scanned using

resultsHigh-quality MBW images were obtained with bSSFP sequences using a reduced dose (100 mL) of inhaled hyperpolarized

conclusionsImproved sensitivity in MBW-I can be achieved with polarization-efficient bSSFP sequences. Same scan-session 3D MBW-I with

Indexed as

Administration, InhalationAdultFemaleHeliumHumansIsotopesLungMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMetabolic Clearance RatePulmonary Gas ExchangeRadiopharmaceuticalsRespiratory MechanicsSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedXenon IsotopesYoung AdultHeliumHelium-3IsotopesRadiopharmaceuticalsXenon-129Xenon Isotopes129Xe3Hehyperpolarized gaslung functionmultiple breath washout

Identifiers

PMID27404992
PMCPMC5484367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.