Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27404959›Full record

ArticleAcademic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine2016

The 2016 Academic Emergency Medicine Consensus Conference, "Shared Decision Making in the Emergency Department: Development of a Policy-relevant Patient-centered Research Agenda" Diagnostic Testing Breakout Session Report.

Tyler W Barrett, Kristin L Rising, M Fernanda Bellolio, M Kennedy Hall, Aaron Brody, Kenneth W Dodd, Mira Grieser, Phillip D Levy, Ali S Raja, Wesley H Self and 3 more

Abstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Tyler W BarrettDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Kristin L RisingDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA.
M Fernanda BellolioDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
M Kennedy HallDivision of Emergency Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Aaron BrodyDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI.
Kenneth W DoddDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN.
Mira GrieserProgram Officer, Addressing Disparities, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, Washington, DC.
Phillip D LevyDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI.
Ali S RajaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Wesley H SelfDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Gail WeingartenPatient Representative, Philadelphia, PA.
Erik P HessDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Judd E HollanderDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA.

Funding

MI-BP: mHealth to Improve Blood Pressure Control in Hypertensive African AmericansR01HL127215 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BUIS, LORRAINE R · 2016 to 2020
$3.0M
Adjunct vitamin D therapy as a means to reduce the disparity in subclinical targeR01MD005849 · NIMHD · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI LEVY, PHILLIP DAVID · 2011 to 2015
$1.9M
Salivary Cortisol as a Marker of Community-Acquired Pneumonia Severity in AdultsK23GM110469 · NIGMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI SELF, WESLEY H · 2015 to 2018
$683k
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL127215NIGMS NIH HHS K23 GM110469NIMHD NIH HHS R01 MD005849
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diagnostic testing is an integral component of patient evaluation in the emergency department (ED). Emergency clinicians frequently use diagnostic testing to more confidently exclude "worst-case" diagnoses rather than to determine the most likely etiology for a presenting complaint. Increased utilization of diagnostic testing has not been associated with reductions in disease-related mortality but has led to increased overall healthcare costs and other unintended consequences (e.g., incidental findings requiring further workup, unnecessary exposure to ionizing radiation or potentially nephrotoxic contrast). Shared decision making (SDM) presents an opportunity for clinicians to discuss the benefits and harms associated with diagnostic testing with patients to more closely tailor testing to patient risk. This article introduces the challenges and opportunities associated with incorporating SDM into emergency care by summarizing the conclusions of the diagnostic testing group at the 2016 Academic Emergency Medicine Consensus Conference on SDM. Three primary domains emerged: 1) characteristics of a condition or test appropriate for SDM, 2) critical elements of and potential barriers to SDM discussions on diagnostic testing, and 3) financial aspects of SDM applied to diagnostic testing. The most critical research questions to improve engagement of patients in their acute care diagnostic decisions were determined by consensus.

Indexed as

Decision MakingPatient ParticipationDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresEmergency MedicineEmergency Service, HospitalHumansPatient-Centered CarePolicy

Identifiers

PMID27404959
PMCPMC5145733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.