Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27404663›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Community Willingness to Participate in a Dengue Study in Aceh Province, Indonesia.

Harapan Harapan, Samsul Anwar, Aslam Bustaman, Arsil Radiansyah, Pradiba Angraini, Riny Fasli, Salwiyadi Salwiyadi, Reza Akbar Bastian, Ade Oktiviyari, Imaduddin Akmal and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Risk perception and level of knowledge of diseases transmitted by Aedes aegypti.Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Harapan HarapanMedical Research Unit, School of Medicine, Syiah Kuala University, Banda Aceh, Indonesia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7630-8413
Samsul AnwarDepartment of Statistics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Syiah Kuala University, Banda Aceh, Indonesia.
Aslam BustamanDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Syiah Kuala University, Banda Aceh, Indonesia.
Arsil RadiansyahMedical Research Unit, School of Medicine, Syiah Kuala University, Banda Aceh, Indonesia.
Pradiba AngrainiMedical Research Unit, School of Medicine, Syiah Kuala University, Banda Aceh, Indonesia.
Riny FasliMedical Research Unit, School of Medicine, Syiah Kuala University, Banda Aceh, Indonesia.
Salwiyadi SalwiyadiMedical Research Unit, School of Medicine, Syiah Kuala University, Banda Aceh, Indonesia.
Reza Akbar BastianMedical Research Unit, School of Medicine, Syiah Kuala University, Banda Aceh, Indonesia.
Ade OktiviyariMedical Research Unit, School of Medicine, Syiah Kuala University, Banda Aceh, Indonesia.
Imaduddin AkmalMedical Research Unit, School of Medicine, Syiah Kuala University, Banda Aceh, Indonesia.
Muhammad IqbalaminMedical Research Unit, School of Medicine, Syiah Kuala University, Banda Aceh, Indonesia.
Jamalul AdilMedical Research Unit, School of Medicine, Syiah Kuala University, Banda Aceh, Indonesia.
Fenni HenrizalMedical Research Unit, School of Medicine, Syiah Kuala University, Banda Aceh, Indonesia.
Darmayanti DarmayantiMedical Research Unit, School of Medicine, Syiah Kuala University, Banda Aceh, Indonesia.
Rovy PratamaMedical Research Unit, School of Medicine, Syiah Kuala University, Banda Aceh, Indonesia.
Jonny Karunia FajarMedical Research Unit, School of Medicine, Syiah Kuala University, Banda Aceh, Indonesia.
Abdul Malik SetiawanDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, State Islamic University Maulana Malik Ibrahim, Malang, Indonesia.
Allison ImrieSchool of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia.
Ulrich KuchInstitute of Occupational Medicine, Social Medicine and Environmental Medicine, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
David Alexander GronebergInstitute of Occupational Medicine, Social Medicine and Environmental Medicine, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
R Tedjo SasmonoEijkman Institute for Molecular Biology, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Meghnath DhimalNepal Health Research Council (NHRC), Ministry of Health Complex, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Ruth MüllerInstitute of Occupational Medicine, Social Medicine and Environmental Medicine, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDengue virus infection is the most rapidly spreading vector-borne disease in the world. Essential research on dengue virus transmission and its prevention requires community participation. Therefore, it is crucial to understand the factors that are associated with the willingness of communities in high prevalence areas to participate in dengue research. The aim of this study was to explore factors associated with the willingness of healthy community members in Aceh province, Indonesia, to participate in dengue research that would require phlebotomy. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsA community-based cross-sectional study was carried out in nine regencies and municipalities of Aceh from November 2014 to March 2015. Interviews using a set of validated questionnaires were conducted to collect data on demography, history of dengue infection, socioeconomic status, and knowledge, attitude and practice regarding dengue fever. Two-step logistic regression and Spearman's rank correlation (rs) analysis were used to assess the influence of independent variables on dependent variables. Among 535 participants, less than 20% had a good willingness to participate in the dengue study. The factors associated with good willingness to participate were being female, working as a civil servant, private employee or entrepreneur, having a high socioeconomic status and good knowledge, attitude and practice regarding dengue. Good knowledge and attitude regarding dengue were positive independent predictors of willingness to participate (OR: 2.30 [95% CI: 1.36-3.90] and 3.73 [95% CI: 2.24-6.21], respectively). CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE: The willingness to participate in dengue research is very low among community members in Aceh, and the two most important associated factors are knowledge and attitude regarding dengue. To increase participation rate, efforts to improve the knowledge and attitude of community members regarding dengue fever and dengue-related research is required before such studies are launched.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedCommunity ParticipationDengueFemaleHumansIndonesiaMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID27404663
PMCPMC4942142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.