ArticleAnnals of the American Thoracic Society2016
Epidemiology of Vasopressin Use for Adults with Septic Shock.
Article in Annals of the American Thoracic Society, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- ADJUNCTIVE VASOPRESSORS AND SHORT-TERM MORTALITY IN ADULTS WITH SEPTIC SHOCK: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS.Shock (Augusta, Ga.) · 2025Pooled it
- Reduced exposure to vasopressors through permissive hypotension to reduce mortality in critically ill people aged 65 and over: the 65 RCT.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2021Pooled it
- Incidence of Hypotension after Discontinuation of Norepinephrine or Arginine Vasopressin in Patients with Septic Shock: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of Korean medical science · 2020Pooled it
- Trial
- Incidence of hypotension according to the discontinuation order of vasopressors in the management of septic shock: a prospective randomized trial (DOVSS).Critical care (London, England) · 2018Trial
- Effect of vasopressin and its analogues on microcirculatory perfusion: a systematic review.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2026Review
- ABC'S of AI: proposing a clinician's framework for the interpretation of artificial intelligence studies.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan for the Vasopressin for Septic Shock Pragmatic (VASSPR) Cluster-Crossover Randomized Trial.CHEST critical care · 2025Article
- Contemporary reperfusion therapies in patients with intermediate- and high-risk pulmonary embolism.Thrombosis research · 2025Article
- Timing of Vasopressin Initiation in Patients with Septic Shock: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis with Trial Sequential Analysis.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2025Article
- Vasopressin Initiation Timing and In-Hospital Mortality in Septic Shock: An Observational Study of Large Public Databases.Critical care explorations · 2025Observational
- Variation in Corticosteroid Prescribing Practices for Patients With Septic Shock.Critical care explorations · 2025Article
- Hemodynamic Management with Vasopressin for Cardiovascular Surgery.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Review
- Timing of adjunctive vasopressin initiation for septic shock patients and hospital mortality: A multicentre observational study.Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2024Article
- Precision fluid and vasoactive drug therapy for critically ill patients.Pharmacotherapy · 2023Review
- Article
- Adoption of a Novel Vasopressor Agent in Critically Ill Adults.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2023Article
- Hyponatremia in a Patient With Vasodilatory Shock Due to Overdose of Antihypertensive Medications: A Case Report.Cureus · 2023Article
- Adjunctive Vasopressors in Patients with Septic Shock: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
rationaleVasopressin may be used to treat vasodilatory hypotension in septic shock, but it is not recommended by guidelines as a first- or second-line agent. Little is known about how often the drug is used currently in septic shock.
objectivesWe conducted this study to describe patterns of vasopressin use in a large cohort of U.S. adults with septic shock and to identify patient and hospital characteristics associated with vasopressin use.
methodsThis was a retrospective cohort study of adults admitted to U.S. hospitals with septic shock in the Premier healthcare database (July 2008 to June 2013). We performed multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression with hospitals as a random effect to identify factors associated with use of vasopressin alone or in combination with other vasopressors on at least 1 day of hospital admission. We calculated quotients of Akaike Information Criteria (AIC) to determine relative contributions of patient and hospital characteristics to observed variation. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN
resultsAmong 584,421 patients with septic shock in 532 hospitals, 100,923 (17.2%) received vasopressin. A total of 6.1% of patients receiving vasopressin received vasopressin alone, and 93.9% received vasopressin in combination with other vasopressors (up to five vasopressors in 15 different combinations). The mean monthly rate of vasopressin use increased from 14.5 to 19.6% over the study period, representing an average annual relative increase of 8% (P < 0.001). The median hospital rate of vasopressin use for septic shock was 11.7% (range, 0-69.7%). Patient demographic and clinical characteristics, including patient age (adjusted odds ratio, 0.71 for age > 85 yr compared with the reference group of age < 50 yr; 95% confidence interval, 0.69-0.74) and acute respiratory dysfunction (adjusted odds ratio, 3.25; 95% confidence interval, 3.20-3.31), were responsible for the majority of observed variation in vasopressin use (quotient of AICs, 0.56). However, hospital of admission also contributed substantially to observed variation (quotient of AICs, 0.37).
conclusionsApproximately one-fifth of patients with septic shock received vasopressin, but rarely as a single vasopressor. The use of vasopressin has increased over time. The likelihood of receiving vasopressin was strongly associated with the specific hospital to which each patient was admitted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.