Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27404064›Full record

Trial reportAmerican journal of health promotion : AJHP2016

The Influence of Health Literacy on Reach, Retention, and Success in a Worksite Weight Loss Program.

Jamie Zoellner, Wen You, Fabio Almeida, Kacie C A Blackman, Samantha Harden, Russell E Glasgow, Laura Linnan, Jennie L Hill, Paul A Estabrooks

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in American journal of health promotion : AJHP, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Examination of Nutrition Literacy and Quality of Self-monitoring in Behavioral Weight Loss.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2018
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jamie ZoellnerDepartment of Human Nutrition, Foods and Exercise, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA zoellner@vt.edu.
Wen YouDepartment of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Fabio AlmeidaDepartment of Human Nutrition, Foods and Exercise, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Kacie C A BlackmanKeck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Samantha HardenDepartment of Human Nutrition, Foods and Exercise, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Russell E GlasgowColorado Health Outcomes Program, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
Laura LinnanGillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Jennie L HillDepartment of Human Nutrition, Foods and Exercise, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Paul A EstabrooksDepartment of Human Nutrition, Foods and Exercise, Virginia Tech Riverside, Roanoke, VA, USA.

Funding

Tailored Worksite Weight Control ProgramsR01DK071664 · NIDDK · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI ESTABROOKS, PAUL · 2007 to 2011
$3.1M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK071664
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo examine if employee health literacy (HL) status moderated reach, retention, and weight outcomes in a worksite weight loss program.

designThe study was a two-group cluster randomized controlled weight loss trial.

settingThe study was conducted in 28 worksites. SUBJECTS: Subjects comprised 1460 employees with a body mass index >25 kg/m(2).

interventionsTwo 12-month weight loss interventions targeted diet and physical activity behaviors: incentaHEALTH (INCENT; incentivized individually targeted Internet-based intervention) and Livin' My Weigh (LMW; less-intense quarterly newsletters). MEASURES: A validated three-item HL screening measure was self-completed at baseline. Weight was objectively assessed with the Health Spot scale at baseline and 12-month follow-up. ANALYSIS: The impact of HL on program effectiveness was assessed through fixed-effect parametric models that controlled for individual (i.e., age, gender, race, ethnicity, income, education) and worksite random effects.

resultsEnrolled employees had significantly higher HL status [13.54 (1.68)] as compared to unenrolled [13.04 (2.17)] (p < .001). This finding was consistent in both interventions. Also, HL moderated weight loss effects (beta = .66; SE = 027; p = .014) and losing >5% weight (beta = -1.53; SE = .77; p < .047). For those with lower baseline HL, the INCENT intervention produced greater weight loss outcomes compared to LMW. The HL level of employees retained was not significantly different from those lost to follow-up.

conclusionHL influences reach and moderates weight effects. These findings underscore the need to integrate recruitment strategies and further evaluate programmatic approaches that attend to the needs of low-HL audiences.

Indexed as

Health LiteracyWeight Reduction ProgramsComparative Effectiveness ResearchFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient ComplianceTreatment OutcomeWorkplacebehavioral sciencesemployee healthhealth literacyobesityprevention researchrandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID27404064
PMCPMC5542046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.