ArticleScandinavian journal of primary health care2016
Contacting dropouts from type 2 diabetes care in public primary health care: description of the patient population.
Article in Scandinavian journal of primary health care, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Triggers of treatment interruption and resumption among individuals with type 2 diabetes: a narrative cross-sectional qualitative study.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2025Article
- Perceived Future Outcomes of Unsuccessful Treatment and Their Association with Treatment Persistence Among Type-2 Diabetes Patients: A Cross-Sectional Content Analysis.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2023Article
- Factors associated with the degree of glycemic deterioration among patients with type 2 diabetes who dropped out of diabetes care: A longitudinal analysis using medical claims and health checkup data in Japan.Journal of diabetes investigation · 2022Article
- A longitudinal follow-up study of a type 2 diabetes "lost to follow-up" cohort - positive effect on glycaemic control after changes in medication.International journal of circumpolar health · 2020Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo characterize dropouts from type-2 diabetes (T2D) care in communal primary health care.
designAn observational study.
settingIn a Finnish city, patients with T2D who had not contacted the public primary health care system during the past 12 months were identified with a computer based search and contacted by a trained diabetes nurse. SUBJECTS: Dropouts from T2D treatment.
main outcome measuresDemographic factors, laboratory parameters, examinations, medications, and comorbidities.
resultsOf the patients with T2D, 10% (n = 356) were dropouts and 60% of them were men. Median HbA1c was 6.5 (QR for 25% and 75%: 6.0, 7.7) %, (45 [42,61] mmol/mol). Of the dropouts, 14% had HbA1c ≥ 9.0% (75 mmol/mol), and these patients were younger than the other dropouts (mean age 54.4 [SD 10.8] years vs. 60.6 [9.4] years, p < 0.001). Median low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol level was 2.8 (QR 2.1, 3.4) mmol/l. Median systolic blood pressure (BP) was 142 (QR 130, 160) mm Hg. Median diastolic BP was 86 (78, 94) mm Hg. Of the dropouts, 83% had comorbidities and 62% were prescribed metformin as a treatment.
conclusionsTen percent of T2D patients were dropouts of whom those with a poor glycaemic control were younger than the other dropouts. BP and LDL cholesterol concentrations were non-optimal among the majority of the dropouts. Metformin was prescribed less frequently to the dropouts than is usual for T2D patients. The comorbidities were equally common among the dropouts as among the other T2D patients. KEY POINTS Which kinds of patients are dropouts from type-2 diabetes care is not known. • One-tenth of the patients with T2D were dropouts and they generally had good glycaemic control. • Blood pressure and LDL cholesterol concentrations were non-optimal among the majority of the dropouts. • Fourteen percent of these dropouts had HbA1c > 9% (75 mmol/mol) and they were more often younger than the other dropouts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.