Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27403879›Full record

ArticleNeuroscience2016

Selective hair cell ablation and noise exposure lead to different patterns of changes in the cochlea and the cochlear nucleus.

Takaomi Kurioka, Min Young Lee, Amarins N Heeringa, Lisa A Beyer, Donald L Swiderski, Ariane C Kanicki, Lisa L Kabara, David F Dolan, Susan E Shore, Yehoash Raphael

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Identification and quantification of GABAIBRO neuroscience reports · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Effects ofNutrients · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Cochlear Health and Cochlear-implant Function.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Takaomi KuriokaKresge Hearing Research Institute, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, National Defense Medical College, Tokorozawa, Saitama, Japan.
Min Young LeeKresge Hearing Research Institute, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Amarins N HeeringaKresge Hearing Research Institute, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Lisa A BeyerKresge Hearing Research Institute, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Donald L SwiderskiKresge Hearing Research Institute, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Ariane C KanickiKresge Hearing Research Institute, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Lisa L KabaraKresge Hearing Research Institute, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
David F DolanKresge Hearing Research Institute, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Susan E ShoreKresge Hearing Research Institute, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Yehoash RaphaelKresge Hearing Research Institute, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. Electronic address: yoash@umich.edu.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USNational Defense Medical College · JP

Funding

Scientific Synergy CoreP30DC005188 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI DOLAN, DAVID FRANCIS · 2002 to 2016
$10.3M
Enhancing Atoh1 function in hair cell regenerationR01DC014832 · NIDCD · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Gabriel Corfas, Andrew K Groves · 2016 to 2026
$6.7M
Function of trigeminal pathways to the cochlear nucleusR01DC004825 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI SHORE, SUSAN E · 2001 to 2016
$5.5M
Cochlear Implants in Reinnervated EarsR01DC010412 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI RAPHAEL, YEHOASH · 2010 to 2014
$2.2M
NIDCD NIH HHS P30 DC005188NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC004825NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC010412NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014832
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In experimental animal models of auditory hair cell (HC) loss, insults such as noise or ototoxic drugs often lead to secondary changes or degeneration in non-sensory cells and neural components, including reduced density of spiral ganglion neurons, demyelination of auditory nerve fibers and altered cell numbers and innervation patterns in the cochlear nucleus (CN). However, it is not clear whether loss of HCs alone leads to secondary degeneration in these neural components of the auditory pathway. To elucidate this issue, we investigated changes of central components after cochlear insults specific to HCs using diphtheria toxin receptor (DTR) mice expressing DTR only in HCs and exhibiting complete HC loss when injected with diphtheria toxin (DT). We showed that DT-induced HC ablation has no significant impacts on the survival of auditory neurons, central synaptic terminals, and myelin, despite complete HC loss and profound deafness. In contrast, noise exposure induced significant changes in synapses, myelin and CN organization even without loss of inner HCs. We observed a decrease of neuronal size in the auditory pathway, including peripheral axons, spiral ganglion neurons, and CN neurons, likely due to loss of input from the cochlea. Taken together, selective HC ablation and noise exposure showed different patterns of pathology in the auditory pathway and the presence of HCs is not essential for the maintenance of central synaptic connectivity and myelination.

Indexed as

AnimalsAuditory PathwaysCell SizeCell SurvivalCochleaCochlear NucleusDisease Models, AnimalEvoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain StemFemaleHair Cells, AuditoryHearing Loss, Noise-InducedImmunohistochemistryMaleMice, TransgenicMicroscopy, Electron, TransmissionNoiseglutamate receptor ionotropic, AMPA 2Receptors, AMPASlc17a7 protein, mouseVesicular Glutamate Transport Protein 1auditory nerve fibercochlear nucleusmyelinnoise exposureselective hair cell ablationsynapse

Identifiers

PMID27403879
PMCPMC4969227
OpenAlexW2461992817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.