Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27403344›Full record

ArticleNeural plasticity2016

Exploiting Interlimb Arm and Leg Connections for Walking Rehabilitation: A Training Intervention in Stroke.

Taryn Klarner, Trevor S Barss, Yao Sun, Chelsea Kaupp, Pamela M Loadman, E Paul Zehr

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neural plasticity, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Preliminary development and technical evaluation of a belt-actuated robotic rehabilitation platform.Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Taryn KlarnerRehabilitation Neuroscience Laboratory, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada V8W 3N4; Human Discovery Science, International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries (ICORD), Vancouver, BC, Canada V5Z 1M9; Centre for Biomedical Research, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada V8W 2Y2.ORCID 0000-0003-1666-7953
Trevor S BarssRehabilitation Neuroscience Laboratory, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada V8W 3N4; Human Discovery Science, International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries (ICORD), Vancouver, BC, Canada V5Z 1M9; Centre for Biomedical Research, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada V8W 2Y2.ORCID 0000-0003-3466-2750
Yao SunRehabilitation Neuroscience Laboratory, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada V8W 3N4; Human Discovery Science, International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries (ICORD), Vancouver, BC, Canada V5Z 1M9; Centre for Biomedical Research, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada V8W 2Y2.ORCID 0000-0002-0178-3612
Chelsea KauppRehabilitation Neuroscience Laboratory, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada V8W 3N4; Human Discovery Science, International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries (ICORD), Vancouver, BC, Canada V5Z 1M9; Centre for Biomedical Research, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada V8W 2Y2.
Pamela M LoadmanRehabilitation Neuroscience Laboratory, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada V8W 3N4.ORCID 0000-0003-3730-7439
E Paul ZehrRehabilitation Neuroscience Laboratory, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada V8W 3N4; Human Discovery Science, International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries (ICORD), Vancouver, BC, Canada V5Z 1M9; Centre for Biomedical Research, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada V8W 2Y2; Division of Medical Sciences, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada V8W 2Y2.
University of Victoria · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rhythmic arm and leg (A&L) movements share common elements of neural control. The extent to which A&L cycling training can lead to training adaptations which transfer to improved walking function remains untested. The purpose of this study was to test the efficacy of A&L cycling training as a modality to improve locomotor function after stroke. Nineteen chronic stroke (>six months) participants were recruited and performed 30 minutes of A&L cycling training three times a week for five weeks. Changes in walking function were assessed with (1) clinical tests; (2) strength during isometric contractions; and (3) treadmill walking performance and cutaneous reflex modulation. A multiple baseline (3 pretests) within-subject control design was used. Data show that A&L cycling training improved clinical walking status increased strength by ~25%, improved modulation of muscle activity by ~25%, increased range of motion by ~20%, decreased stride duration, increased frequency, and improved modulation of cutaneous reflexes during treadmill walking. On most variables, the majority of participants showed a significant improvement in walking ability. These results suggest that exploiting arm and leg connections with A&L cycling training, an accessible and cost-effective training modality, could be used to improve walking ability after stroke.

Indexed as

Stroke RehabilitationAgedAged, 80 and overArmElectric StimulationElectromyographyExercise TestFemaleHumansLegMaleMiddle AgedMovementReflexStrokeWalking

Identifiers

PMID27403344
PMCPMC4926010
OpenAlexW2444063516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.