Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27403325›Full record

ArticleBMJ open diabetes research & care2016

Psychological barriers to optimal insulin therapy: more concerns in adolescent females than males.

Line Wisting, Lasse Bang, Torild Skrivarhaug, Knut Dahl-Jørgensen, Øyvind Rø

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open diabetes research & care, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Pediatric Smart Insulin Pen Use: The Next Best Thing.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Line WistingDivision of Mental Health and Addiction, Regional Department for Eating Disorders, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Oslo Diabetes Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Lasse BangDivision of Mental Health and Addiction, Regional Department for Eating Disorders , Oslo University Hospital , Oslo , Norway.
Torild SkrivarhaugOslo Diabetes Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Department of Pediatric Medicine, The Norwegian Childhood Diabetes Registry, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Department of Pediatric Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Knut Dahl-JørgensenOslo Diabetes Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Department of Pediatric Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Øyvind RøDivision of Mental Health and Addiction, Regional Department for Eating Disorders, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Oslo University Hospital · NOUniversity of Oslo · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study is to investigate psychological barriers (illness perceptions, insulin beliefs, and coping strategies) to optimal insulin therapy among adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D), with a specific focus on gender differences and mode of treatment (insulin pump vs pen).

methodsA total of 105 males and females (12-20 years) participated in this study. The Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire, the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire, and the Adolescent Coping Orientation for Problem Experiences were completed. Additionally, diabetes clinical data were collected by the Norwegian Childhood Diabetes Registry.

resultsFemales had significantly more negative illness perceptions than males on all dimensions (p<0.05), with moderate-to-large effect sizes. Regarding insulin beliefs, females scored significantly higher than males on insulin concern (p<0.001), indicating more concerns about insulin. There were no significant gender differences on perceptions of insulin necessity. Finally, females scored significantly higher on the coping strategies being social and solving family problems (p<0.01), indicating more positive coping among females than males for these subscales. In terms of treatment mode, the only statistically significant difference in the psychological aspects was for the illness perception treatment control, with patients using insulin pen reporting more negative perceptions on this dimension than patients using insulin pump.

conclusionsAddressing psychological aspects may be a clinically important supplement to standard somatic T1D care. The consistent finding of gender differences across the psychological measures implies that a tailored treatment approach for males and females with T1D may be warranted.

Indexed as

Adolescent DiabetesGender DifferencesPsychological AspectsTreatment Adherence/Compliance

Identifiers

PMID27403325
PMCPMC4932280
OpenAlexW2462771570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.