Evidence map›Paper›PMID 2740328›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America1989

F-actin affinity chromatography: technique for isolating previously unidentified actin-binding proteins.

K G Miller, B M Alberts

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1989. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Functional comparison of full-length palladin to isolated actin binding domain.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2023
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Cytoskeletal domains in the activated platelet.Cell motility and the cytoskeleton · 1995
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

K G MillerDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of California, San Francisco 94143-0448.
B M Alberts
University of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

GENETIC AND BIOCHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF CYTOKINESISR01GM023928 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO · PI MITCHISON, TIMOTHY J · 1985 to 2010
$3.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM08740NIGMS NIH HHS GM23928
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have developed stable and easy to use filamentous actin (F-actin) affinity-chromatography columns that selectively purify proteins that bind to actin filaments from cell extracts. Most traditional assays for actin-associated proteins screen for their effects on actin polymerization or actin filament crosslinking. Because our technique requires only actin-filament binding, it can identify additional types of proteins involved in the function of the actin cytoskeleton. By chromatographing extracts of several types of cells on these columns, we show that known actin-binding proteins are selectively retained as a subset of a larger group of actin-binding proteins that have not been identified previously.

Indexed as

ActinsAnimalsChickensChromatography, AffinityElectrophoresis, Polyacrylamide GelGizzard, AvianMolecular WeightMuscle ProteinsMusclesMuscle, SmoothProtein BindingRabbitsActinsMuscle Proteins

Identifiers

PMID2740328
PMCPMC297504
OpenAlexW2094449686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.