Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27403195›Full record

ReviewEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2016

Fire-Needle Moxibustion for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Meta-Analysis.

Yidan Wang, Xiaohua Xie, Xiaoyue Zhu, Minjie Chu, Yihua Lu, Tian Tian, Xun Zhuang, Liying Jiang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Effect of He'sEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2018
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yidan WangDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu 226009, China.
Xiaohua XieDepartment of Endodontics, Institute of Hard Tissue Development and Regeneration, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang 150001, China.
Xiaoyue ZhuDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu 226009, China.
Minjie ChuDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu 226009, China.
Yihua LuDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu 226009, China.
Tian TianDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu 226009, China.
Xun ZhuangDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu 226009, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3974-8193
Liying JiangDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu 226009, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5179-2069

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of fire-needle moxibustion as an intervention in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (KOA). Methods. An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on fire-needle moxibustion in treating KOA was conducted by searching PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Wanfang database, and the Chinese Medical Database (CNKI) since their inception through March 2016. The meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3. Results. Thirteen RCTs were identified in the systematic study which consisted of 1179 participants. Fire-needle moxibustion treatment group had a statistical significance on recovery rate as well as recovery and marked-improvement rate compared with control group. Subgroup analysis indicated that there was significant difference between fire-needle moxibustion group and control group. However, GRADE analysis indicated that the quality of evidence for all outcomes was relatively low. Only two of 13 studies reported adverse reactions (difficulty in movement and intolerance of cold). Conclusion. This meta-analysis suggests that fire-needle moxibustion is more effective than control group in symptom management of KOA. Further high quality trials should be conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of fire-needle moxibustion on KOA.

Identifiers

PMID27403195
PMCPMC4925950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.