ArticleChild & youth care forum2016
An Open Trial of the Anxiety Action Plan (
Article in Child & youth care forum, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Adapting CBT for youth anxiety: Flexibility, within fidelity, in different settings.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2023Review
- Epidemiology and Impact of Health Care Provider-Diagnosed Anxiety and Depression Among US Children.Journal of developmental and behavioral pediatrics : JDBP · 2018Article
- Psychosocial interventions for use in pediatric primary care: An examination of providers' perspectives.Families, systems & health : the journal of collaborative family healthcare · 2016Article
- Integrating Children's Mental Health into Primary Care.Pediatric clinics of North America · 2016Review
- Using vignettes to assess contributions to the work of addressing child mental health problems in primary care.BMC health services research · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAnxiety disorders in youth are among the most common psychiatric disorders, yet the majority of affected youth do not receive treatment. One approach to improving access to care is identification and intervention within the primary care setting.
objectiveThis manuscript presents data from a single group pre-post open trial of the
methodsEleven pediatricians conducted the intervention with 25 youth (mean age 11.16 years; range 6-18 years) with elevated levels of anxiety in their primary care practice setting.
resultsPediatricians' ratings of the
conclusionsFindings suggest that a brief, pediatrician-delivered intervention in primary care settings appears feasible and beneficial to patients. Additional controlled evaluation of the intervention's efficacy is needed.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.