Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27402991›Full record

SynthesisAmerican journal of pharmaceutical education2016

A Systematic Review of the Effects of Continuing Education Programs on Providing Clinical Community Pharmacy Services.

Paulo Roque Obreli-Neto, Tiago Marques Dos Reis, Camilo Molino Guidoni, Edmarlon Girotto, Marisabelle Lima Guerra, André de Oliveira Baldoni, Leonardo Régis Leira Pereira

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in American journal of pharmaceutical education, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Health-promoting services provided in pharmacies: A systematic review.Journal of education and health promotion · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Paulo Roque Obreli-NetoUniversity of Sao Paulo Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ribeirao Preto, Sao Paulo, Brazil; Faculdades Integradas de Ourinhos, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Tiago Marques Dos ReisUniversity of Sao Paulo Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ribeirao Preto, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Camilo Molino GuidoniState University of Londrina, Londrina, Parana, Brazil.
Edmarlon GirottoState University of Londrina, Londrina, Parana, Brazil.
Marisabelle Lima GuerraHealth Care Center Tereza Evaristo Marcomini, Salto Grande, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
André de Oliveira BaldoniUniversidade Federal de São João Del Rei, Divinópolis, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Leonardo Régis Leira PereiraUniversity of Sao Paulo Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ribeirao Preto, Sao Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective. To summarize the effects of media methods used in continuing education (CE) programs on providing clinical community pharmacy services and the methods used to evaluate the effectiveness of these programs. Methods. A systematic review was performed using Medline, SciELO, and Scopus databases. The timeline of the search was 1990 to 2013. Searches were conducted in English, Portuguese, and Spanish. Results. Nineteen articles of 3990 were included. Fourteen studies used only one media method, and the live method (n=11) was the most frequent (alone or in combination). Only two studies found that the CE program was ineffective or partially effective; these studies used only the live method. Most studies used nonrobust, nonvalidated, and nonstandardized methods to measure effectiveness. The majority of studies focused on the effect of the CE program on modifying the knowledge and skills of the pharmacists. One study assessed the CE program's benefits to patients or clients. Conclusion. No evidence was obtained regarding which media methods are the most effective. Robust and validated methods, as well as assessment standardization, are required to clearly determine whether a particular media method is effective.

Indexed as

Communications MediaCommunity Pharmacy ServicesEducation, Pharmacy, ContinuingHumansPharmacy Service, Hospitalcommunity pharmacycontinuing educationpharmacy service

Identifiers

PMID27402991
PMCPMC4937983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.