Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27402986›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of pharmaceutical education2016

A Comparison of Patient-Centered Care in Pharmacy Curricula in the United States and Europe.

Ines Nunes-da-Cunha, Blanca Arguello, Fernando Martinez Martinez, Fernando Fernandez-Llimos

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of pharmaceutical education, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Digital pharmacists: the new wave in pharmacy practice and education.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Nordic Pharmacy Schools' Experience in Communication Skills Training.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ines Nunes-da-CunhaUniversity of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Blanca ArguelloUniversity of Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal; Institute for Medicines Research, Lisbon, Portugal.
Fernando Martinez MartinezUniversity of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Fernando Fernandez-LlimosUniversity of Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal; Institute for Medicines Research, Lisbon, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective. To compare United States and European Higher Education Area (EHEA) undergraduate pharmacy curricula in terms of patient-centered care courses. Methods. Websites from all pharmacy colleges or schools in the United States and the 41 countries in the EHEA were retrieved from the FIP Official World List of Pharmacy Schools and investigated. A random sample of schools was selected and, based on analyses of course descriptions from syllabi, each course was classified into the following categories: social/behavioral/administrative pharmacy sciences, clinical sciences, experiential, or other/basic sciences. Results. Of 147 schools of pharmacy, 59 were included (23 in US and 36 in the EHEA). Differences existed in the percentages of credits/hours in all of the four subject area categories. Conclusion. Institutions in EHEA countries maintain a greater focus on basic sciences and a lower load of clinical sciences in pharmacy curricula compared to the United States. These differences may not be in accordance with international recommendations to educate future pharmacists focused on patient care.

Indexed as

CurriculumSchools, PharmacyEducation, PharmacyEuropeHumansPatient-Centered CareRandom AllocationUnited StatescurriculumEducationEuropepatient-centeredpharmacyUnited States

Identifiers

PMID27402986
PMCPMC4937978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.