ArticleAmerican journal of pharmaceutical education2016
Insights, Pearls, and Guidance on Successfully Producing and Publishing Educational Research.
Article in American journal of pharmaceutical education, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- An Integrative Review of Approaches Used to Assess Course Interventions.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2023Review
- Exploring the Attitudes and Perceptions of Master of Medical Education Graduates Towards Research Publication in Saudi Arabia.Advances in medical education and practice · 2022Article
- Implementing a Novel Software Program to Support Pharmacy Students' Reflective Practice in Scientific Research.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2021Article
- Reimagining Pharmacy Education through the Lens of a Choose Your Own Adventure Activity-A Qualitative Evaluation.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Motivating Students to Engage in Preparation for Flipped Classrooms by Using Embedded Quizzes in Pre-class Videos.Innovations in pharmacy · 2021Article
- Strategies, Ideas, and Lessons Learned While Engaging in SoTL Without Formal Training.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2020Article
- A Comparison of Student Outcomes Between Longitudinally and Traditionally Placed Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experiences.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2019Article
- Writing from the Head and the Heart.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2019Article
- Assessing Students' Impressions of the Cultural Awareness of Pharmacy Faculty and Students.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2018Article
- Help! Dean Drowning in Survey Requests.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2017Article
- Supporting Faculty in Successfully Producing and Publishing Educational Research: What Colleges and Organizations Can Do.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It is the collaborative responsibility of authors, reviewers, and editors to produce high-quality manuscripts that advance knowledge and educational practice. Experience with manuscript submissions to the American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education reveal several areas for improvement that authors can make to increase their submission success rate during the review process. These improvements include research question justification, improved clarity and details regarding methodology, concise data and results, and a discussion that frames research findings in the context of what is already known. This paper summarizes common flaws we see in submitted manuscripts and makes suggestions on how to address these areas and improve publication success.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.