Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27402703›Full record

ArticleJournal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950)2016

Pan-Specific Prediction of Peptide-MHC Class I Complex Stability, a Correlate of T Cell Immunogenicity.

Michael Rasmussen, Emilio Fenoy, Mikkel Harndahl, Anne Bregnballe Kristensen, Ida Kallehauge Nielsen, Morten Nielsen, Søren Buus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 163 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
163citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

163 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Therapeutic vaccines for NSCLC: From mechanisms to clinical translation.Chinese medical journal pulmonary and critical care medicine · 2026
    Review
  4. Technical review of artificial intelligence in TCR-T therapy.Journal of the National Cancer Center · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Computational Methods for Cancer Neoantigen Prediction.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  20. Article

103 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Michael RasmussenLaboratory of Experimental Immunology, Department of International Health, Immunology and Microbiology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 2200 N Copenhagen, Denmark;
Emilio FenoyInstituto de Investigaciones Biotecnológicas, Universidad Nacional de San Martín, San Martín, B 1650 HMP, Buenos Aires, Argentina; and.ORCID 0000-0001-9121-7149
Mikkel HarndahlLaboratory of Experimental Immunology, Department of International Health, Immunology and Microbiology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 2200 N Copenhagen, Denmark;
Anne Bregnballe KristensenLaboratory of Experimental Immunology, Department of International Health, Immunology and Microbiology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 2200 N Copenhagen, Denmark;
Ida Kallehauge NielsenLaboratory of Experimental Immunology, Department of International Health, Immunology and Microbiology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 2200 N Copenhagen, Denmark;ORCID 0000-0003-0791-8925
Morten NielsenInstituto de Investigaciones Biotecnológicas, Universidad Nacional de San Martín, San Martín, B 1650 HMP, Buenos Aires, Argentina; and Center for Biological Sequence Analysis, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.
Søren BuusLaboratory of Experimental Immunology, Department of International Health, Immunology and Microbiology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 2200 N Copenhagen, Denmark; sbuus@sund.ku.dk.ORCID 0000-0001-8363-1999

Funding

NIAID NIH HHS HHSN272201200010C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Binding of peptides to MHC class I (MHC-I) molecules is the most selective event in the processing and presentation of Ags to CTL, and insights into the mechanisms that govern peptide-MHC-I binding should facilitate our understanding of CTL biology. Peptide-MHC-I interactions have traditionally been quantified by the strength of the interaction, that is, the binding affinity, yet it has been shown that the stability of the peptide-MHC-I complex is a better correlate of immunogenicity compared with binding affinity. In this study, we have experimentally analyzed peptide-MHC-I complex stability of a large panel of human MHC-I allotypes and generated a body of data sufficient to develop a neural network-based pan-specific predictor of peptide-MHC-I complex stability. Integrating the neural network predictors of peptide-MHC-I complex stability with state-of-the-art predictors of peptide-MHC-I binding is shown to significantly improve the prediction of CTL epitopes. The method is publicly available at http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/NetMHCstabpan.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerAntigen PresentationEpitopes, T-LymphocyteHistocompatibility Antigens Class IHumansLymphocyte ActivationPeptidesProtein StabilityEpitopes, T-LymphocyteHistocompatibility Antigens Class IPeptides

Identifiers

PMID27402703
PMCPMC4976001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.