Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27402633›Full record

ArticleTechnology in cancer research & treatment2017

Weekly Cisplatin and Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy With Simultaneous Integrated Boost for Radical Treatment of Advanced Cervical Cancer in Elderly Patients: Feasibility and Clinical Preliminary Results.

Rosario Mazzola, Francesco Ricchetti, Alba Fiorentino, Niccolò Giaj Levra, Sergio Fersino, Gioacchino Di Paola, Ruggero Ruggieri, Filippo Alongi

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Technology in cancer research & treatment, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rosario Mazzola1 Radiation Oncology, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria-Cancer Care Center, Negrar, Verona, Italy.
Francesco Ricchetti1 Radiation Oncology, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria-Cancer Care Center, Negrar, Verona, Italy.
Alba Fiorentino1 Radiation Oncology, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria-Cancer Care Center, Negrar, Verona, Italy.
Niccolò Giaj Levra1 Radiation Oncology, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria-Cancer Care Center, Negrar, Verona, Italy.
Sergio Fersino1 Radiation Oncology, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria-Cancer Care Center, Negrar, Verona, Italy.
Gioacchino Di Paola2 Statistic Sciences Faculty, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Ruggero Ruggieri1 Radiation Oncology, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria-Cancer Care Center, Negrar, Verona, Italy.
Filippo Alongi1 Radiation Oncology, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria-Cancer Care Center, Negrar, Verona, Italy.
Ospedale Sacro Cuore Don Calabria · ITUniversity of Palermo · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo evaluate the feasibility and clinical preliminary results of weekly cisplatin and volumetric-modulated arc therapy to the pelvis with simultaneous integrated boost to macroscopic disease in a cohort of elderly patients. MATERIALS AND

methodsInclusion criteria of this prospective study were age ≥70 years, Karnofsky performance status 70 to 100, locally advanced histologically proven squamous cervical carcinoma, and patients unable to undergo brachytherapy. Radiation doses prescribed were 66 Gy to the macroscopic disease and 54 Gy to the pelvic nodes in 30 fractions. Weekly cisplatin dose was 40 mg/mq.

resultsA total of 30 patients were recruited. Median follow-up was 32 months (range: 8-48 months). Median age was 72 years (range: 70-84 years). The 3-year overall survival and local control were 93% and 80%, respectively. The median time to progression was 24 months (range: 6-30 months). Analyzing clinical outcome grouping based on the stage of disease, II versus III, the 3-year overall survival was 100% and 85%, respectively. The 3-year local control was 91% for stage II and 67% for stage III. Acute and late toxicities were acceptable without severe events.

conclusionWeekly cisplatin and volumetric-modulated arc therapy-simultaneous integrated boost for radical treatment of advanced cervical cancer in the current cohort of elderly patients were feasible. Long-term results and prospective randomized trials are advocated.

Indexed as

Radiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedAgedAged, 80 and overBrachytherapyCarcinoma, Squamous CellCisplatinCombined Modality TherapyDose Fractionation, RadiationFemaleHumansLymph NodesMaleRadiotherapy DosageUterine Cervical NeoplasmsCisplatinadvanced cervical cancerelderly patientsgynecological malignanciesVMAT

Identifiers

PMID27402633
PMCPMC5616045
OpenAlexW2474245472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.