Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27402511›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2016

National Malaria Prevalence in Cambodia: Microscopy Versus Polymerase Chain Reaction Estimates.

Dysoley Lek, Jean Popovici, Frederic Ariey, Seshu Babu Vinjamuri, Sylvia Meek, Jan Bruce, Walter R J Taylor, Duong Socheat, Didier Menard, William O Rogers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Contribution of real-time PCR to Plasmodium species identification and to clinical decisions: a nationwide study in a non-endemic setting.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2017
    Article
  8. Plasmodium vivax Malaria in Cambodia.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Dysoley LekNational Center for Parasitology, Entomology and Malaria Control, Phnom Penh, Cambodia. School of Public Health, National Institute of Public Health, Phnom Penh, Cambodia. soleyl@cnm.gov.kh.
Jean PopoviciInstitut Pasteur in Cambodia, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Frederic ArieyInstitut Pasteur in Cambodia, Phnom Penh, Cambodia. Department of Parasites and Insect Vectors, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France. Institut Cochin, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U1016 (INSERM U1016), Faculté de Médecine, Université Paris Descartes Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France. Laboratoire de Parasitologie-Mycologie, Hôpital Cochin, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France.
Seshu Babu VinjamuriWorld Health Organization Lao People's Democratic Republic Office, Vientiane, Lao People's Democratic Republic.
Sylvia MeekLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Jan BruceLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Walter R J TaylorService de Médecine Tropicale et Humanitaire, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland. Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Bangkok, Thailand.
Duong SocheatNational Center for Parasitology, Entomology and Malaria Control, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Didier MenardInstitut Pasteur in Cambodia, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
William O RogersNaval Medical Research Unit 2 Detachment, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate information regarding malaria prevalence at national level is required to design and assess malaria control/elimination efforts. Although many comparisons of microscopy and polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based methods have been conducted, there is little published literature covering such comparisons in southeast Asia especially at the national level. Both microscopic examination and PCR detection were performed on blood films and dried blood spots samples collected from 8,067 individuals enrolled in a nationwide, stratified, multistage, cluster sampling malaria prevalence survey conducted in Cambodia in 2007. The overall malaria prevalence and prevalence rates of Plasmodium falciparum, Plasmodium vivax, and Plasmodium malariae infections estimated by microscopy (N = 8,067) were 2.74% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.39-3.12%), 1.81% (95% CI: 1.53-2.13%), 1.14% (95% CI: 0.92-1.40%), and 0.01% (95% CI: 0.003-0.07%), respectively. The overall malaria prevalence based on PCR detection (N = 7,718) was almost 2.5-fold higher (6.31%, 95% CI: 5.76-6.89%, P < 0.00001). This difference was significantly more pronounced for P. falciparum (4.40%, 95% CI: 3.95-4.90%, P < 0.00001) compared with P. vivax (1.89%, 95% CI: 1.60-2.22%, P < 0.001) and P. malariae infections (0.22%, 95% CI: 0.13-0.35%, P < 0.0001). The significant proportion of microscopy-negative but PCR-positive individuals (289/7,491, 3.85%) suggest microscopic examination frequently underestimated malaria infections and that active case detection based on microscopy may miss a significant reservoir of infection, especially in low-transmission settings.

Indexed as

AdolescentCambodiaChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMalariaMalaria, FalciparumMalaria, VivaxMaleMicroscopyPlasmodium falciparumPlasmodium malariaePlasmodium vivax

Identifiers

PMID27402511
PMCPMC5014264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.