Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27402392›Full record

ArticleDiabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders2016

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of d-Nav for People with Diabetes at High Risk of Neuropathic Foot Ulcers.

William Green, Matthew Taylor

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Cost-effectiveness analysis of the Neuropad device as a screening tool for early diabetic peripheral neuropathy.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2020
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Impact of a Novel Insulin Management Service on Non-insulin Pharmaceutical Expenses.Journal of health economics and outcomes research · 2018
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

William GreenUniversity of York, York Health Economics Consortium, York, UK. william.green@york.ac.uk.
Matthew TaylorUniversity of York, York Health Economics Consortium, York, UK.
Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe objective of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of the d-Nav Insulin Guidance Service (Hygieia Inc.), a system designed to improve glycemic control via the use of insulin titration, in people with diabetes at risk of developing neuropathic foot ulcers.

methodsA Markov model containing four health states (no ulcer, uninfected ulcer, infected ulcer, and amputation) was developed to compare d-Nav with current National Health Service standard care. Patient movement between the health states was governed by event rates taken from the wider literature. Both the healing rate for uninfected ulcers and the rate of recurrence for uninfected ulcers were directly influenced by the patient's glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c). Separate mean HbA1c values were assigned to treatment and control patients and taken from a single-arm study that examined the effect of d-Nav on the outcomes of 122 patients, with HbA1c for control patients based on values recorded in the 12-month period prior to the study and HbA1c for d-Nav based on values recorded during the trial. Weekly cycles were applied, and patient resource use and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were estimated over a 3-year time horizon. Univariate sensitivity analysis was undertaken.

resultsIn the base case, d-Nav was cost-saving and produced more QALYs than standard care, with a total net monetary benefit value of £1459 per patient. Univariate analysis indicated that the model results are relatively robust to variations in underlying parameters, with patient HbA1c having the most significant impact on outcomes.

conclusionInterventions that aim to improve glycemic control, such as d-Nav, appear to be a cost-effective use of healthcare resources when targeted at those with poor glycemic control at high risk of developing foot ulcers.

fundingHygieia Inc.

Indexed as

Cost-effectiveness analysisDiabetesd-NavFoot ulcerGlycemic control

Identifiers

PMID27402392
PMCPMC5014789
OpenAlexW2468748168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.