Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27402371›Full record

ReviewFuture oncology (London, England)2016

Systemic therapy for bladder cancer finally comes into a new age.

Matthew Zibelman, Elizabeth R Plimack

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Future oncology (London, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02863913 (A Dose-escalation Phase I Trial of PD-1 Knockout Engineered T Cells for the Treatment of Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02863913 phase1withdrawnnot on this map

A Dose-escalation Phase I Trial of PD-1 Knockout Engineered T Cells for the Treatment of Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorPeking UniversityRan2016 to 2019Enrolled0ConditionsInvasive Bladder Cancer Stage IVArmsPD-1 Knockout T Cells, Cyclophosphamide, IL-2
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Matthew ZibelmanFox Chase Cancer Center, Temple Health. 333 Cottman Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA.
Elizabeth R PlimackFox Chase Cancer Center, Temple Health. 333 Cottman Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA.
Fox Chase Cancer Center · US

Funding

WORD PROCESSING CENTER--COREP30CA006927 · NCI · RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CAN CTR · PI Margaret von Mehren · 1985 to 2026
$138.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006927
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Systemic therapy for bladder cancer, both localized muscle-invasive disease and metastatic disease, has seen minimal progress over the past two decades. Current approaches rely upon cytotoxic chemotherapy combinations aimed at increasing cure rates or achieving palliation and disease control, but these regimens are fraught with short- and long-term toxicities and outcomes remain suboptimal. The emergence of systemic immunotherapies that can provide durable remissions in subsets of patients with other malignancies has the potential to transform the field, and early phase trials have begun to demonstrate activity in some patients with metastatic bladder cancer. In this article, we review the current state of systemic therapy for bladder cancer and discuss the current literature and ongoing trials utilizing various immunotherapies.

Indexed as

Combined Modality TherapyHumansImmunotherapyNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm MetastasisUrinary Bladder Neoplasmsbladder cancercheckpoint blockadeCTLA-4immunotherapyneoadjuvant chemotherapyPD-1urothelial carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID27402371
PMCPMC5066115
OpenAlexW2466664624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.