ArticleSchmerz (Berlin, Germany)2016
[Chronic pain care : Reality and entitlement].
Article in Schmerz (Berlin, Germany), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- [An instrument to assess biopsychosocial pain concepts in adults : Development and evaluation by experts].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2025Article
- Cancer-related pain in long-term survivors of oncological diseases: results of a survey on the current care situation.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024Article
- [Spiritual interventions in multimodal pain management].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2024Article
- [Chronic pain as an existential challenge].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2023Article
- Chronic pain as a blind spot in the diagnosis of a depressed society. On the implications of the connection between depression and chronic pain for interpretations of contemporary society.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2022Article
- Chronic pain patients' need for recognition and their current struggle.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2021Article
- [Chronic pain and society : Sociological analysis of a complex interconnection].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
From the point of view of healthcare policies, improvement in pain care has been required for years; however, there is a great discrepancy between the current need for pain care and the actual provision by healthcare services. This article seeks to demonstrate that while healthcare policies are one of the critical factors involved, a variety of conceptual, diagnostic and therapeutic causes should also be taken into account. Firstly, considering that pain care is primarily concerned with the suffering of pain by patients, the focus lies with their conscious experience in order to define the patients' understanding of pain. Additionally, in this article current biomedical and psychosocial comprehension concerning chronic pain will be illustrated and why it is necessary to broaden our horizons in order to do justice to patients with chronic pain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27402265What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.