ReviewSchmerz (Berlin, Germany)2016
[Placebo response - Mechanisms and clinical applications].
Review in Schmerz (Berlin, Germany), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Research on placebo responses has made major progress in recent years. Placebo responses are psychobiological events, which are created by the entire therapeutic context. They can appear at any time, not only in experimental and clinical settings. Several studies on analgesia-related placebo research showed that patients have higher placebo responses in comparison to healthy participants, which may also last longer. Expectations play a key role in placebo analgesia. They can be induced via three central psychological mechanisms: 1) expectation induced via instructions, 2) expectation induced via classical conditioning and 3) expectation induced via social learning. These mechanisms are controlled by neurobiological structures and modulate pain perception resulting in pain relief by positive expectations and increased pain by negative expectations, the so-called nocebo effect. There is an ongoing discussion that these psychological mechanisms may also play a central role in inducing and maintaining itch-reducing placebo responses. The current state of research suggests that placebo responses could be used in clinical contexts and should not be viewed as being in competition with medications but as an additive increase in efficacy of a pharmacological substance through specifically induced placebo responses. This targeted use is also possible within ethical guidelines. Important prerequisites are that the research results can be transferred from healthy participants to patients and that the placebo responses are reproducible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27402263What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.