Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27402103›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical oncology2016

Improvement of renal function by changing the bone-modifying agent from zoledronic acid to denosumab.

Mutsushi Yamasaki, Takeshi Yuasa, Sho Uehara, Yasuhisa Fujii, Shinya Yamamoto, Hitoshi Masuda, Iwao Fukui, Junji Yonese

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mutsushi YamasakiDepartment of Urology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Ariake, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan.
Takeshi YuasaDepartment of Urology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Ariake, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan. takeshi.yuasa@jfcr.or.jp.
Sho UeharaDepartment of Urology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Ariake, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan.
Yasuhisa FujiiDepartment of Urology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Ariake, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan.
Shinya YamamotoDepartment of Urology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Ariake, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan.
Hitoshi MasudaDepartment of Urology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Ariake, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan.
Iwao FukuiDepartment of Urology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Ariake, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan.
Junji YoneseDepartment of Urology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Ariake, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan.
Japanese Foundation For Cancer Research · JPThe Cancer Institute Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn order to help in selecting the optimum bone-modifying agent (BMA; zoledronic acid or denosumab), we investigated the impact of the BMA on the renal function of patients with bone metastases. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe present study consisted of 118 patients who were treated with denosumab for bone metastases secondary to prostate cancer, renal cell cancer, and urothelial cancer at our hospital between 2012 and 2015. The clinical course of the renal function of these patients, treated with zoledronic acid or denosumab, was retrospectively evaluated.

resultsOf the 118 patients who were treated with denosumab during the study period, 57 (48 %) had previously been administered zoledronic acid and 61 (52 %) had received denosumab as the first-line BMA. The reasons for changing from zoledronic acid to denosumab were increased creatinine serum level (26 patients, 46 %), patient preference (16 patients, 28 %), difficulty with venous infusion (10 patients, 17 %), and other reasons (5 patients, 9 %). The median level of creatinine clearance in the patients who changed from zoledronic acid to denosumab due to increased serum creatinine level was 59.9 ml/min before administration of zoledronic acid, 40.9 ml/min at the beginning of denosumab treatment, 47.5 ml/min at 3 months after administration of denosumab, and 52.0 ml/min at the last follow-up. There were significant differences.

conclusionsFor the first time, we demonstrated that the renal function of some patients, which had deteriorated following zoledronic acid administration, successfully improved after changing to denosumab.

Indexed as

Bone NeoplasmsDenosumabDiphosphonatesImidazolesAgedBone Density Conservation AgentsComparative Effectiveness ResearchHumansJapanKidney Function TestsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CareRetrospective StudiesUrogenital NeoplasmsBone Density Conservation AgentsDenosumabDiphosphonatesImidazolesZoledronic AcidBone metastasisBone-modifying agentsDenosumabRenal functionZoledronic acid

Identifiers

PMID27402103
PMCPMC5124438
OpenAlexW2463796064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.