Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27402064›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical pharmacology2017

Pharmacokinetic, Pharmacodynamic, and Safety Profile of a Novel Anti-CD28 Domain Antibody Antagonist in Healthy Subjects.

Rong Shi, Marek Honczarenko, Sean Zhang, Catherine Fleener, Johanna Mora, Sun Ku Lee, Reena Wang, Xiaoni Liu, Diane E Shevell, Zheng Yang and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical pharmacology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Impact of selective CD28 blockade on virus-specific immunity to a murine Epstein-Barr virus homolog.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Novel Treatments in Lupus.Frontiers in immunology · 2018
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Rong ShiBristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Marek HonczarenkoBristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Sean ZhangGlaxoSmithKline, King of Prussia, PA, USA.
Catherine FleenerPfizer Inc, Groton, CT, USA.
Johanna MoraBristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Sun Ku LeeBristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Reena WangBristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Xiaoni LiuBristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Diane E ShevellBristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Zheng YangBristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Haiqing WangBristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Bindu MurthyBristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States) · USGlaxoSmithKline (United States) · USPfizer (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We report pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of a novel anti-CD28 domain antibody antagonist (lulizumab pegol) in healthy subjects following single- or multiple-dose administration. A minimal anticipated biological effect level approach was used to select a 0.01 mg starting dose for a single-ascending-dose (SAD), double-blind, first-in-human study. Part 1 included 9 intravenous (IV; 0.01-100 mg) and 3 subcutaneous (SC; 9-50 mg) doses or placebo. In part 2, a keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) immunization was performed in 16 subjects/panel, who received 1 of 3 IV doses (9-100 mg) or placebo. In a double-blind, multiple-ascending-dose (MAD) study, subjects received SC lulizumab 6.25 mg every 2 weeks, 12.5 mg weekly, 37.5 mg weekly, or placebo. Among 180 treated subjects, 169 completed the studies. Peak concentrations and areas under the curve from time 0 to infinity increased dose proportionally. Estimated SC bioavailability was 68.2%. Receptor occupancy of approximately ≥80% was maintained for ≥2 weeks at ≥9-mg doses (SAD) and throughout the dosing interval (MAD). IV doses ≥9 mg inhibited antibody production against KLH for 2 weeks. No significant cytokine or immune cell changes were observed. No immunogenicity responses persisted, and there was no correlation to adverse events. Headache occurred in 21 SAD and 4 MAD subjects receiving lulizumab; in the MAD study 5 lulizumab subjects experienced infections. Lulizumab IV or SC was safe at all doses studied, without evidence of cytokine release.

Indexed as

Administration, IntravenousAdolescentAdultAntibodiesAntibodies, BlockingBiological AvailabilityCD28 AntigensCytokinesDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHeadacheHealthy VolunteersHemocyaninsHumansInjections, SubcutaneousAntibodiesAntibodies, BlockingCD28 AntigensCytokinesHemocyaninskeyhole-limpet hemocyaninlulizumab pegolPolyethylene GlycolsReceptors, Immunologicbiologicsclinical trials (CTR)immunopharmacology (imm)pharmacodynamics (PDY)pharmacokinetics and drug metabolismrheumatology

Identifiers

PMID27402064
PMCPMC5697635
OpenAlexW2474635501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.