Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27401895›Full record

ReviewThe oncologist2016

Gastroenteropancreatic Well-Differentiated Grade 3 Neuroendocrine Tumors: Review and Position Statement.

Romain Coriat, Thomas Walter, Benoît Terris, Anne Couvelard, Philippe Ruszniewski

Abstract readReviewConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Review in The oncologist, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Dual-tracer PET/CT and cocktail therapy with [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Romain CoriatDepartment of Gastroenterology, Cochin Teaching Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France Faculté de Médecine, Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France romain.coriat@cch.aphp.fr.
Thomas WalterHospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Service d'Oncologie Digestive, Lyon Cedex 03, France Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Université de Lyon, , Lyon, France.
Benoît TerrisDepartment of Pathology, Cochin Teaching Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France Faculté de Médecine, Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Anne CouvelardDepartment of Pathology, Bichat Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Départements Hospitalo Universitaires, Paris, France Department of Gastroenterology and Pancreatology, Beaujon Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Départements Hospitalo Universitaires, Clichy, France.
Philippe RuszniewskiUniversité Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France Department of Gastroenterology and Pancreatology, Beaujon Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Départements Hospitalo Universitaires, Clichy, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

: In 2010, the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of neuroendocrine neoplasms was reviewed and validated the crucial role of the proliferative rate. According to the WHO classification 2010, gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms are classified as well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) of grade 1 or 2 in up to 84%, or poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas in 6%-8%. Neuroendocrine carcinomas are of grade G. Recently, a proportion of neuroendocrine tumors presenting a number of mitoses or a Ki-67 index higher than 20% and a well-differentiated morphology have been identified, calling for a new category, well-differentiated grade 3 NET (NET G-3). Studies that have reported the characteristics of neuroendocrine neoplasms have identified more well-differentiated NET G-3 than neuroendocrine carcinomas. The main localizations of NET G-3 are the pancreas, stomach, and colon. Treatment for NET G-3 is not standardized and is balanced between G-1/2 neuroendocrine tumor and neuroendocrine carcinoma treatments. In nonmetastatic neuroendocrine tumors, the European and American guidelines recommended a surgical resection for localized neuroendocrine neoplasm, irrespective of the tumor grading. In NET G-3, chemotherapy is the benchmark if the main treatment goal is reduction of the tumor mass, particularly if it would allow a secondary surgery. In the present work, we review the epidemiology and make recommendations for the management of NET G-3. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Neuroendocrine tumors presenting a number of mitoses or a Ki-67 index higher than 20% and a well-differentiated morphology have been identified and named well-differentiated grade 3 neuroendocrine tumors (NET G-3). The main localizations of NET G-3 are the pancreas, stomach, and colon. The prognosis is worse than that for NET G-2. In nonmetastatic NET G-3, surgery appeared to be the first option. The chemotherapy regimen in pancreatic NET G-3 should be in line with that implemented in NET G-1/2 when the Ki-67 index is below 55% and should be in line with that implemented for neuroendocrine carcinoma when Ki-67 is above 55%.

Indexed as

Chemoembolization, TherapeuticDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansIntestinal NeoplasmsKi-67 AntigenMolecular Targeted TherapyNeoplasm GradingNeuroendocrine TumorsPancreatic NeoplasmsStomach NeoplasmsKi-67 AntigenChemotherapyGrade 3Neuroendocrine tumorTargeted therapyWell-differentiatedWHO classification

Identifiers

PMID27401895
PMCPMC5061528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.