Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27401819›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2016

Implementation of repeat HIV testing during pregnancy in Kenya: a qualitative study.

Anna Joy Rogers, Elly Weke, Zachary Kwena, Elizabeth A Bukusi, Patrick Oyaro, Craig R Cohen, Janet M Turan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Knowledge of HIV status among mothers accompanying their infants for immunization in Machakos, Kenya, 2014.East African journal of applied health monitoring and evaluation · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Anna Joy RogersDepartment of Health Care Organization and Policy, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Public Health, Birmingham, USA. rogersaj@uab.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-9907-8806
Elly WekeCentre for Microbiology Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
Zachary KwenaCentre for Microbiology Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
Elizabeth A BukusiCentre for Microbiology Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
Patrick OyaroCentre for Microbiology Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
Craig R CohenDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco California, USA.
Janet M TuranDepartment of Health Care Organization and Policy, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Public Health, Birmingham, USA.
Kenya Medical Research Institute · KEUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Ujima Mentoring ProgramP30MH062246 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI MALLORY O JOHNSON · 2001 to 2026
$57.4M
UAB Center for Clinical and Translational Science (CCTS)UL1TR001417 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI KIMBERLY, ROBERT P. · 2015 to 2018
$31.4M
MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM008361 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI YACOUBIAN, TALENE ALENE · 1992 to 2024
$16.8M
UAB Center for Clinical and Translational Sciences (CCTS)TL1TR001418 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI SAAG, KENNETH G · 2015 to 2018
$2.1M
A Home-Based Couples Intervention to Enhance PMTCT and Family Health in KenyaR34MH102103 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI TURAN, JANET M. · 2014 to 2016
$622k
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR001418NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001417NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008361NIMH NIH HHS P30 MH062246NIMH NIH HHS R34 MH102103
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRepeat HIV testing in late pregnancy has the potential to decrease rates of mother-to-child transmission of HIV by identifying mothers who seroconvert after having tested negative for HIV in early pregnancy. Despite being national policy in Kenya, the available data suggest that implementation rates are low.

methodsWe conducted 20 in-depth semi-structured interviews with healthcare providers and managers to explore barriers and enablers to implementation of repeat HIV testing guidelines for pregnant women. Participants were from the Nyanza region of Kenya and were purposively selected to provide variation in socio-demographics and job characteristics. Interview transcripts were coded and analyzed in Dedoose software using a thematic analysis approach. Four themes were identified a priori using Ferlie and Shortell's Framework for Change and additional themes were allowed to emerge from the data.

resultsParticipants identified barriers and enablers at the client, provider, facility, and health system levels. Key barriers at the client level from the perspective of providers included late initial presentation to antenatal care and low proportions of women completing the recommended four antenatal visits. Barriers to offering repeat HIV testing for providers included heavy workloads, time limitations, and failing to remember to check for retest eligibility. At the facility level, inconsistent volume of clients and lack of space required for confidential HIV retesting were cited as barriers. Finally, at the health system level, there were challenges relating to the HIV test kit supply chain and the design of nationally standardized antenatal patient registers. Enablers to improving the implementation of repeat HIV testing included client dissemination of the benefits of antenatal care through word-of-mouth, provider cooperation and task shifting, and it was suggested that use of an electronic health record system could provide automatic reminders for retest eligibility.

conclusionsThis study highlights some important barriers to improving HIV retesting rates among pregnant women who attend antenatal clinics in the Nyanza region of Kenya at the client, provider, facility, and health system levels. To successfully implement Kenya's national repeat HIV testing guidelines during pregnancy, it is essential that these barriers be addressed and enablers capitalized on through a multi-faceted intervention program.

Indexed as

Administrative PersonnelAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelFacility Design and ConstructionFemaleHealth PersonnelHealth Services AccessibilityHIV InfectionsHumansInfectious Disease Transmission, VerticalInterviews as TopicKenyaMaleMaternal AgePatient Acceptance of Health CarePregnancyReagent Kits, DiagnosticGuideline implementationHIV counseling and testingKenyaPMTCTPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID27401819
PMCPMC4940827
OpenAlexW2471218443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.